Why don't you use the SMTP that ship with NT? You already own it.
At 03:45 PM 11/20/03 -0600, you wrote:
>If I was going to decide I would ask myself:
>
>Pro IMGate
>1) Do I know unix or want to know unix.
>2) Do I have the space for another box (or two)
>3) Do I want to spend the money for the hardware
>4) Do I have the time to learn how to get all the
> pieces that make up IMGate
>5) Is my customer base large enough to where I need to
> off load some processing.
>
>Pro Declude
>1) Dont' have to mess with learning unix right now
>2) Less points of hardware/failure the better
>3) My time costs more than the price of Declude
>4) I don't have to buy money for hardware.
>
>Both are anti-spam, but IMGate also offloads processing
>
>We use Declude and it works well, but we want to offload some processing
>like IMGate without adding more machines.
>
>We currently are in an all NT environment with 2 servers that act as
>domain controllers and name servers. We would like to add a function
>similar to what IMGate is doing without buying 2 more Imail licenses.
>
>We are exploring a product called Inframail that will act as a gateway,
>does Maps/Orbs as well as adding filters. The product is very robust,
>has an interesting scripting language, and I am trying to persuade the
>author to add a command line anti-virus (like DOS Norton Anitvirus) and
>he is exploring that possibility. (http://www.infradig.com)
>
>So many choices .........;-)
>
>Andy
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Terry L Fritts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 11:41 AM
>Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Product Compare Declude/ImGate
>
>
> > I think declude works very well. Scott's done a good job of making it
> > rather fast for all that it does. I am haveing greatest success
>though with
> > putting warnings in the headers and then letting the users manage the
>mails
> > locally. If you set the restrictions too tight it blocks a lot of
>email but
> > unfortunately a significant number are valid and wanted.
> >
> > Terry Fritts
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Atkinson
> > Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 10:53 AM
> > To: IMail_Forum1 (E-mail)
> > Subject: [IMail Forum] Product Compare Declude/ImGate
> >
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I'm in the process of comparing several anti-spam products that work
>with
> > Imail. They are ImGate and Declude. I know ImGate needs another
>server and
> > Declude does not. Does anyone have any experience with Declude and
>how do
> > you like it.
> >
> > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> > to be removed from this list.
> >
> > An Archive of this list is available at:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> >
> >
>
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>to be removed from this list.
>
>An Archive of this list is available at:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
----
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
----
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
