> I dunno - maybe there's something else that triggers the "No 'To;'
> address" filter. One of my AOL subscribers tells me he gets all...
Rumor has it that AOL has a secret "point" system (IE maybe you lose 1 point if you
have no reverse DNS, 3 points if you are listed in their open relay database, etc.).
> PS - I STILL worry about the "Precedence: bulk" line.
> Why does a line like that even exist, if not to assist those wish
> to filter IMail list server messages?
That's pretty standard to help prioritize mail. That way, for example, a mail server
that has a queue (spool) that is full can send out the E-mail without the bulk
precedence first. It's not unique to IMail. Although it would be nice to have
control over it, I'm sure most people would just disable it, which ruins its original
intent.
--
-Scott
Declude: Anti-virus and Anti-spam solutions for IMail. http://www.declude.com
--
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
