Okay, well tell ya what....you spend 6 months paying lots of talented
developers good salaries to improve a product and sell it for $500 and
you'll be gone in less than a year. But hey, you aren't doing this to make
money, right? You whine about price all the time, as if that were the only
factor. And to top it all off, they finally give you what you ask for, and
you do nothing but complain about the price. Tell me something. Is it work
$7,850 to keep your 1500 employees virus free? Think of the time and money
saved if you can keep viruses off of all the desktops in an organization
without buying 1500 copies of an anti-virus program. The math works.

As for Scott helping with Declude, I am sure he is quite competent. He seems
to be able to make you happy where IPSwitch cannot. If you have that
solution already, where is all this hostility coming from? Surely you cannot
expect IPSwitch to just "eat" the cost of developing this most important
module that people like yourself have been asking for?

And you should make up your mind. You posted earlier:

"Now after I begged for this solution for years, and Imail
just sits there on their hands, they now introduce a new
intergrated solution today charging thousands just like the
big antivirus companies, instead of partnering with Declude
for more rational ethical solutions, with more features, at
the fraction of the costs."

and now you're changing that with "Beyond that, at least the way I do
business, if I can make a product that works better without laying another
whole product
on top of mine at ten times the cost, well, I just think that's  the way
business should be done." So they should've partnered with Declude, is that
what this is all about? You know, Yahoo!, one of the largest Internet
portals out there, doesn't use Declude to scan their email. Why don't you
flame them?

I am sure the product will deliver just what it promises. IPSwitch has never
released software that wasn't useful and stable. WS_FTP was around before
the public even knew what the Internet was! It's one thing to suggest
something useful. It's another to flame a company because they didn't do it
YOUR way. Seems to me you already have a solution using IMGate and Declude.
So use it and quit whining because your organization can't afford a $7850
solution that works. Tech support isn't a volunteer vocation. In an idea
world, everything would be free. But this is the real world, and people
don't work for free..especially talented people. Give IPSwitch a break. They
have to pay the bills just like eveyone else, and better products mean
higher prices.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rick Peacock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:55 PM
Subject: Re[4]: [IMail Forum] New IMail Anti-Virus ad Declude


> Reply to: Rick Peacock
>       Re: [IMail Forum] New IMail Anti-Virus ad Declude on Friday 12:18:56
PM
>
> I've also been with Imail since version 3.x, so I have been here
> just as long. And I was asking for a trully integrated Imail
> antivirus solution for over three years, right in this forum.
> I got an opportunity to get SSL and a $1000 calendar and a few
> goodies when the single most important step Imail could have
> taken three years ago was add some kind of antivirus product.
>
> Three years, and the only one who helped me was Scott with Declude,
> not Ipswitch. We were planning on abandoning Imail until Scott
> came along. I wonder how many people kept Imail because of Scott?
> IMHO, Declude is much more elegant than setting up another separate
> server with more open ports using substantially more resources
> on the same machine) and 'double server processing' mail from one
> to the other.
>
> Beyond that, at least the way I do business, if I can make a
> product that works better without laying another whole product
> on top of mine at ten times the cost, well, I just think that's
> the way business should be done. I have always thought that if I
> can provide a more competitive product that is easier to run and
> is far more cost effetive for my customers, and more secure,
> that's the easy choice I should make from a marketing perspective.
> That's in the best interest of my customers.
>
> If I were a customer who understood all the benefits of each
> avenue or choice and you were asking me to purchase a product
> with half the features at ten times the price I'd have to question
> whether you were acting on my behalf. I'd also have to question
> if your objective was really 'to improve your product'. Right
> now I'd have to say no.
>
> --
> Roger Heath
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ----- Copy of Original Message(s): -----
>
> R> Roger,
>
> R> You seem to think that charging more for a product to a customer who is
> R> "not-so-saavy" seems unfair? Let's take a look at the marketplace as a
> R> whole. I am sure that everyone on this list uses a product with lots of
> R> third-party add-ons - WINDOWS! So you think that by charging the money
> R> Symantec charges, when "saavy" people use the free McAfee scanner,
Symantec
> R> is out of line? Puh-lease! IPSwitch is just like any other company -
> R> striving to improve their product.
>
> R> So they didn't choose someone cheaper. If you're so smart in marketing,
then
> R> tell me this - who would you partner with? Someone with worldwide name
> R> recognition, or someone that almost no one in the business world has
ever
> R> heard of? Do you have any IDEA how many people buy NAV and even
> R> SUBSCRIPTIONS because of name recognition alone?!
>
> R> IPSwitch even told you that they SUPPORT 3RD PARTY SOLUTIONS! If you
don't
> R> like the IPSwitch solution, you, as a "saavy" user, can opt not to buy
the
> R> NAV module and use your other options instead. The reality is, if no
one
> R> buys the more expensive modules, then maybe they look at a more
> R> cost-effective solution.
>
> R> I've been with Imail for years (since version 3.0). They started out as
a
> R> small company with a fantastic product that was very modestly priced.
With
> R> improvements in the product, prices have risen. So what?! The product
out
> R> today(even WITH the AntiVirus module) is a hundred times better than
the
> R> original because that's the way it's supposed to be! As the product
evolves
> R> so does it's cost.  Price is based on the VALUE of the product - not
what
> R> one small group of people think it should cost.  If  you don't like the
> R> price then vote with your wallet. So what if it costs more? IPSwitch is
not
> R> a charity - it's a BUSINESS. Businesses make money (oooh! What a
concept! A
> R> web business that makes money? How dare they!).You want cheap? Use some
of
> R> the FREEWARE mail servers and use this list for support, as it was
> R> intended - not as a way to take cheap shots at a company that doesn't
do
> R> EXACTLY what YOU think it should.
>
> R> Rick
> R>  ----- Original Message -----
> R> From: "Roger Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> R> To: "Bob McGregor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> R> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> R> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:15 PM
> R> Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] New IMail Anti-Virus ad Declude
>
>
> >> Reply to: Bob McGregor
> >>       Re: [IMail Forum] New IMail Anti-Virus ad Declude on Wednesday
> R> 12:53:53 PM
> >>
> >> Very well put. Even Mail Essentials is one-third the
> >> price with maybe 50-100 more features depending how
> >> you look at it and you can still use what ever command
> >> line scanner you want. But it will still not be as
> >> integrated and low in cost and efficient and unique
> >> to Imail as Declude.
> >>
> >> Taking advantage of 'not-so-savvy' customers to this degree
> >> is not a pretty picture of a company at all.
> >>
> >> BTW, I have received a private email from the CTO of
> >> Ipswitch that indicates they intend to continue to
> >> support apps like Declude and 3rd party development
> >> and not block them. I hope that is always the case.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Roger Heath
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> Reply to: Don Weber
> >>       Re: [IMail Forum] New IMail Anti-Virus ad Declude on Wednesday
> R> 12:08:00 PM
> >>
> >> B> you musta missed the last 2 weeks of this list, this has been round
and
> R> round a few
> >> B> times, and lots of users feel the
> >>
> >> Not really. I just received the formal announcement of
> >> Imail AntiVirus this morning.
> >>
> >> ----- Copy of Original Message(s): -----
> >>
> >> B> Don Says:
> >>
> >> >>IPSwitch will most likely enjoy success making the big dollar sales
with
> >> >>the big dollar and big name oriented consumers or those who don't
take
> >> >>the time and get educated.
> >>
> >> B> This is true and they will get sales.... but imagine you're new to
> >> B> Imail and you purchase the Imail and AV stuff from them and then
find
> >> B> out about this list.
> >>
> >> B> You subscribe (like we all did) and then you find out there's a
> >> B> solution that is way less money AND the existing people (experts in
> >> B> your eyes) all highly tout it.... AND you find out it's been
> >> B> there longer!
> >>
> >> B> Would you not wonder why they just bent you over for thousands of
> R> bucks??
> >>
> >> B> Major question is "Why does Ipswitch not value it's existing
customer
> >> B> base or it's 3rd party folks???"
> >>
> >> B> bob
> >>
> >>
> >> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> >> to be removed from this list.
> >>
> >> An Archive of this list is available at:
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> >>
>
>
> R> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> R> to be removed from this list.
>
> R> An Archive of this list is available at:
> R> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to