Jamie, >BTW...are you an extremely fair person or an ipswitch spy???
Are you a Stalker Systems or Deerfield spy <g>? Seriously, anyone who's been on this list for the past couple of years can tell you that I'm not an Ipswitch spy--I was actually *flamed* by the admitted Ipswitch imposter "Harry Sacks," a kicking off a crazy thread a few months ago. I'm a systems architect for an integrator with no business ties to Ipswitch (we've never even bought Imail for our clients, instead steering them to the web site to buy direct). We've put Imail in high-demand situations--a site builder ASP, financial and pharmaceutical HQs, et al.--and have never been disappointed. But depending on requirements, we roll out and support several other standards-based mail systems, too, including Win32- and *nix-based ones, and have even deployed Exchange without guns to our heads. So the answer is...a fair person (I don't feel right saying I'm extremely *anything*...I'll leave the complimenting to you!) I love to find workarounds for problems that most users, and even vendors, think are impossible to solve. My experience with Imail's SMTP/POP3 architecture makes me confident that "there's a 'there' there," as they say, so I can go about augmenting that stable core in unexpected ways. Web messaging isn't really my area, so I've never been able to really help there; as a lurker on related threads, though, I've learned that Imail isn't the go-to product for WM. Such core stability issues (rather than functional issues) are always going to fall on Ipswitch; no matter how many workarounds you try, if that leaky app is still loaded, it has the final word. Good luck, Sandy Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
