What mailserver have you seen that did not require some form of the full email address for auth when using multiple virtual domains? The only one I ever used like that could not have user overlap, i.e. you could not have [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the same server. The problem is the MUA does not send which domain it is trying to use to the server when it connects, unlike HTTP clients that send it as part of the request to the HTTPD.
Thanks, Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Delbridge Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 3:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Virtual Servers in 8.0? Hi all, Can someone please tell me if IMail version 8.0 elliminates the requirement for individual IPs per domain? We went the "virtual" route with version 7.x and our hosting customers positively HATE the 'name%domain.com' username formatting requirement. If IMail has addressed this in version 8.0, I will upgrade to correct the problem. Otherwise, we are pondering a complex port-mapping solution that would translate so many hundred (thousand?) non-routable IPs (one 10.x.x.x address for each domain name hosted by the IMail server) to a respective subset of public IPs. This is an ugly solution, if it'll even work. Thank you for any input. Dave -- David M. Delbridge President & CEO Circa 3000 ColdFusion Hosting http://www.circa3k.com 775-832-2445 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
