Awesome - if I was handier with the google there's been a long running
argument on whether a GIS consists of the data or the software. Well -
actually - this is an old article ->
http://www.directionsmag.com/articles/sierra-club-vs-orange-county-pra-lawsuit-update-december-10-2011/219926
So - could they GPL the data and get away with that - is GPL compatible
with ODBL? I assume MIT is.....
Randy
-----------------
Randal Hale, GISP
North River Geographic Systems, Inc
http://www.northrivergeographic.com
423.653.3611 [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
twitter:rjhale
http://about.me/rjhale
On 12/02/2013 08:19 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Randal Hale
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Actually - I saw you were using MIT - wouldn't that just cover
software?
The MIT license mentions software and documentation, so technically
you're right, but if you replace "software and documentation" with
"data and documentation", then it works fine. Or you could take
"software and documentation" to mean include the data in question.
_______________________________________________
Imports-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
