Surajit sir, thank you for your tireless efforts. I also agree with *T.
sulcatum* in both this thread and the other.
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/indiantreepix/WsS7RH-k8V0/_geQhnWEZhEJ>
I looked in a lot of other district flora and find no mention of *Tetrastigma
nilagiricum*. So that may be ruled out too!

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:33 PM, surajit koley <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Many thanks to Rawat Sir.
>
> Anurag Ji, following Flora of India KEY I would like to try one more time.
>
> We can skip all species after KEY-11b.
> We can also skip species no. 8 at KEY-9b
> We can also skip species no. 14 at KEY-10a. (we do not have fruits. but
> distribution is unlikely?)
>
> That leaves us with only two species - *T. sulcatum* and *T. nilagiricum*.
>
> It appears to me it is same species as in your other upload -
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/WsS7RH-k8V0/_geQhnWEZhEJ
>
> Thank you
> Regards
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:27 PM, surajit koley <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Here you have account of *T. leucostaphylum* from Singapore
>> <http://lkcnhm.nus.edu.sg/nis/bulletin2012/2012nis263-270.pdf>, Anurag
>> Ji. A bit more elaborate
>> https://floraofsingapore.wordpress.com/2010/08/07/tetrastigma-leucostaphylum/.
>> And also see pictures in
>> http://www.natureloveyou.sg/Tetrastigma%20leucostaphylum/Main.html.
>>
>> Perhaps you can skip *T. l.* too!
>>
>> Thank you
>> Regards
>> surajit
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed sir.
>>> And also sir, here are those sheets that I referred, one from Coorg
>>> flora and the other Hassan flora.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:51 PM, surajit koley <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not only the stem character, Anurag Ji, leaves of *T. leucostaphylum* are
>>>> broadly elliptic as per JCB, it goes against your description you keyed in
>>>> your table (comparing both *muricatum* and *leucostaphylum*). Fruit
>>>> sized also differs in JCB.
>>>>
>>>> So, it's a very complicated case, as can be seen in discrepancies in
>>>> KEY and descriptions across various literature.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>> Regards
>>>> surajit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That is quite odd sir. Different books report different shapes.
>>>>> Thank you sir.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:47 AM, surajit koley <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes Anurag Ji, perhaps we can skip *T. lanceolarium* and *T.
>>>>>> sulcatum*.
>>>>>> Since branches are not angled and one or two leaf 3 foliolate it
>>>>>> should be *T. muricatum*, not *T. leucostaphylum*. Leaves also match
>>>>>> with Flora-Karnataka (JCB) herbarium. However, JCB says branches of *T.
>>>>>> leucostaphyllum* is terete and leaves elliptic! Yet, it is closer to *T.
>>>>>> muricatum*, I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good evening sir,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I go with *Tetrastigma muricatum/Tetrastigma leucostaphylum*
>>>>>>> because the Gamble description (1
>>>>>>> <http://ia802706.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=floraofpresidenc01gambrich&itemPath=%2F12%2Fitems%2Ffloraofpresidenc01gambrich&server=ia802706.us.archive.org&page=n311_w294>
>>>>>>> and 2
>>>>>>> <http://ia902706.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=floraofpresidenc01gambrich&itemPath=%2F12%2Fitems%2Ffloraofpresidenc01gambrich&server=ia902706.us.archive.org&page=n312_w294>)
>>>>>>> effectively rules out *Tetrastigma lanceolarium* (although the key
>>>>>>> puts the species under *not or little tuberculate*). And the other
>>>>>>> possible species Tetrastigma sulcatum
>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/herb/Tetrastigma%20sulcatum/P1010392.JPG>
>>>>>>> can be ruled out (if you agree) based on the leaf margin because as you
>>>>>>> say, they may not be crenate but rather distantly serrate
>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/pdf/Tetrastigma%20muricatum/360.pdf.jpg>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regarding the size of the leaves, I believe I have a very simple
>>>>>>> answer. I, very unwittingly, picked out a set of NEW AND SMALL LEAVES!
>>>>>>> Please see the attached photo. Although blurry, the *background *shows
>>>>>>> significantly larger leaves than the small leaves in the* centre
>>>>>>> left* of the photo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As for the conundrum between *Tetrastigma muricatum/Tetrastigma
>>>>>>> leucostaphylum*:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Character
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Tetrastigma muricatum*
>>>>>>> <http://plantillustrations.org/illustration.php?id_illustration=34915>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Tetrastigma leucostaphylum*
>>>>>>> <http://plantgenera.org/illustration.php?id_illustration=123031>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Branches
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Terete, muricate
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Angled, tuberculate/muricate
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leaves
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Usually 3-foliate, may be pedately 5-foliate (sizes very similar)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leaves pedately 5-foliate (sizes very similar)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leaflets
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Broadly elliptic
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oblanceolate
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Inflorescence
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ferruginous
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ferruginous
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fruit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1cm across (cannot find no. of seeds)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1 cm across, 2-4 seeded
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The place is quite accessible with a guide and is only a few hours
>>>>>>> away from Bangalore. I will update with fruits if possible.
>>>>>>> In the meanwhile, please let me know what you think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you very much.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 5:53 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some earlier relevant feedback:
>>>>>>>>       Again I fail to reach a conclusive decision. What I notice
>>>>>>>> in your attached pics are -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    - branch muricated, as in T. muricatum
>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fflorakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in%2Fhjcb2%2Fherbsheet.php%3Fid%3D4508%26cat%3D1&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGe4VstBMYFvCU8Xfc87yOC1DU8jw>,
>>>>>>>>    T. leucostaphylum
>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/herbsheet.php?id=4506&cat=1>,
>>>>>>>>    *T. sulcatum
>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/herbsheet.php?id=4507&cat=1>*
>>>>>>>>    - I am not sure if branches are sulcate
>>>>>>>>    - flowering season doesn't match with *muricatum*, match with
>>>>>>>>    *sulcatum*, don't have info on *leucostaphylum*
>>>>>>>>    - leaves in your pics do not have long petiole, whereas
>>>>>>>>    herbaria of *sulcatum* and *muricatum* show long petioled leaves
>>>>>>>>    - I am not sure if these leaves can be called crenate, as in
>>>>>>>>    *sulcatum*
>>>>>>>>    - Wight Icones T 740 has not been referred to *sulcatum*
>>>>>>>>    - Icones T 740 is related with *muricatum* and *leucostaphylum*
>>>>>>>>    - T 740 has acuminate leaflets, moderately long petiole
>>>>>>>>    - I think leaves and inflorescence rather match with Icones T
>>>>>>>>    28, but branch in that plate is not muricated. T 28 is related to
>>>>>>>>    *sulcatum* as per FBI
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No need to hurry, first of anything is your study, you do need not
>>>>>>>> reply any thread right now. I can and will wait until your are done 
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> all your other priorities.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it's better to to wait for the mature fruits of this plant
>>>>>>>> if it's in your vicinity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can download Icones from
>>>>>>>> http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/92#/summary.
>>>>>>>> Meanwhile attached here related plates for your perusal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you and best wishes for your upcoming exams.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tetrastigma
>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/v/vitaceae/tetrastigma>
>>>>>>>>  species in eFloraofindia (with details/ *keys*from published
>>>>>>>> papers/ regional floras/ FRLHT/ FOI/ Biotik/ efloras/ books etc., where
>>>>>>>> ever available)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>> From: Anurag Sharma <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Date: 27 March 2015 at 20:52
>>>>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:219386] ANMAR55/77 Please identify this
>>>>>>>> plant
>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Family: Vitaceae
>>>>>>>> Date: 24th March 2015
>>>>>>>> Place: Mullayanagiri, Chikamagalur, Karnataka
>>>>>>>> Habit: Climber
>>>>>>>> Habitat: Shola forest
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>>>>>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
>>>>>>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource
>>>>>>>> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more than
>>>>>>>> a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, 
>>>>>>>> Plants
>>>>>>>> etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use them for 
>>>>>>>> free
>>>>>>>> as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian
>>>>>>>> Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest
>>>>>>>> in the world- more than 2400 members & 2,00,000 messages on 9.9.14) or 
>>>>>>>> Efloraofindia
>>>>>>>> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a
>>>>>>>> species database of more than 10,000 species & 2,00,000 images). Winner
>>>>>>>> of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds
>>>>>>>> of India'.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>> St. Josephs College
>>> Bangalore
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Anurag N. Sharma
BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
St. Josephs College
Bangalore

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to