The KEW herb of *T. nilagiricum* links -

   1. http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000701414
   2. http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000701415

Thank you

Regards


On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Surajit sir, thank you for your tireless efforts. I also agree with *T.
> sulcatum* in both this thread and the other.
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/indiantreepix/WsS7RH-k8V0/_geQhnWEZhEJ>
> I looked in a lot of other district flora and find no mention of *Tetrastigma
> nilagiricum*. So that may be ruled out too!
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:33 PM, surajit koley <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Many thanks to Rawat Sir.
>>
>> Anurag Ji, following Flora of India KEY I would like to try one more time.
>>
>> We can skip all species after KEY-11b.
>> We can also skip species no. 8 at KEY-9b
>> We can also skip species no. 14 at KEY-10a. (we do not have fruits. but
>> distribution is unlikely?)
>>
>> That leaves us with only two species - *T. sulcatum* and *T. nilagiricum*
>> .
>>
>> It appears to me it is same species as in your other upload -
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/WsS7RH-k8V0/_geQhnWEZhEJ
>>
>> Thank you
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:27 PM, surajit koley <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Here you have account of *T. leucostaphylum* from Singapore
>>> <http://lkcnhm.nus.edu.sg/nis/bulletin2012/2012nis263-270.pdf>, Anurag
>>> Ji. A bit more elaborate
>>> https://floraofsingapore.wordpress.com/2010/08/07/tetrastigma-leucostaphylum/.
>>> And also see pictures in
>>> http://www.natureloveyou.sg/Tetrastigma%20leucostaphylum/Main.html.
>>>
>>> Perhaps you can skip *T. l.* too!
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Regards
>>> surajit
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Indeed sir.
>>>> And also sir, here are those sheets that I referred, one from Coorg
>>>> flora and the other Hassan flora.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:51 PM, surajit koley <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Not only the stem character, Anurag Ji, leaves of *T. leucostaphylum* are
>>>>> broadly elliptic as per JCB, it goes against your description you keyed in
>>>>> your table (comparing both *muricatum* and *leucostaphylum*). Fruit
>>>>> sized also differs in JCB.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, it's a very complicated case, as can be seen in discrepancies in
>>>>> KEY and descriptions across various literature.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> surajit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That is quite odd sir. Different books report different shapes.
>>>>>> Thank you sir.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:47 AM, surajit koley <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes Anurag Ji, perhaps we can skip *T. lanceolarium* and *T.
>>>>>>> sulcatum*.
>>>>>>> Since branches are not angled and one or two leaf 3 foliolate it
>>>>>>> should be *T. muricatum*, not *T. leucostaphylum*. Leaves also
>>>>>>> match with Flora-Karnataka (JCB) herbarium. However, JCB says branches 
>>>>>>> of *T.
>>>>>>> leucostaphyllum* is terete and leaves elliptic! Yet, it is closer
>>>>>>> to *T. muricatum*, I think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Good evening sir,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I go with *Tetrastigma muricatum/Tetrastigma leucostaphylum*
>>>>>>>> because the Gamble description (1
>>>>>>>> <http://ia802706.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=floraofpresidenc01gambrich&itemPath=%2F12%2Fitems%2Ffloraofpresidenc01gambrich&server=ia802706.us.archive.org&page=n311_w294>
>>>>>>>> and 2
>>>>>>>> <http://ia902706.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?id=floraofpresidenc01gambrich&itemPath=%2F12%2Fitems%2Ffloraofpresidenc01gambrich&server=ia902706.us.archive.org&page=n312_w294>)
>>>>>>>> effectively rules out *Tetrastigma lanceolarium* (although the key
>>>>>>>> puts the species under *not or little tuberculate*). And the other
>>>>>>>> possible species Tetrastigma sulcatum
>>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/herb/Tetrastigma%20sulcatum/P1010392.JPG>
>>>>>>>> can be ruled out (if you agree) based on the leaf margin because as you
>>>>>>>> say, they may not be crenate but rather distantly serrate
>>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/pdf/Tetrastigma%20muricatum/360.pdf.jpg>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regarding the size of the leaves, I believe I have a very simple
>>>>>>>> answer. I, very unwittingly, picked out a set of NEW AND SMALL LEAVES!
>>>>>>>> Please see the attached photo. Although blurry, the *background *shows
>>>>>>>> significantly larger leaves than the small leaves in the* centre
>>>>>>>> left* of the photo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As for the conundrum between *Tetrastigma muricatum/Tetrastigma
>>>>>>>> leucostaphylum*:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Character
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Tetrastigma muricatum*
>>>>>>>> <http://plantillustrations.org/illustration.php?id_illustration=34915>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Tetrastigma leucostaphylum*
>>>>>>>> <http://plantgenera.org/illustration.php?id_illustration=123031>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Branches
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Terete, muricate
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Angled, tuberculate/muricate
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Leaves
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Usually 3-foliate, may be pedately 5-foliate (sizes very similar)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Leaves pedately 5-foliate (sizes very similar)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Leaflets
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Broadly elliptic
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oblanceolate
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Inflorescence
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ferruginous
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ferruginous
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fruit
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1cm across (cannot find no. of seeds)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1 cm across, 2-4 seeded
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The place is quite accessible with a guide and is only a few hours
>>>>>>>> away from Bangalore. I will update with fruits if possible.
>>>>>>>> In the meanwhile, please let me know what you think.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you very much.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 5:53 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some earlier relevant feedback:
>>>>>>>>>       Again I fail to reach a conclusive decision. What I notice
>>>>>>>>> in your attached pics are -
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    - branch muricated, as in T. muricatum
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fflorakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in%2Fhjcb2%2Fherbsheet.php%3Fid%3D4508%26cat%3D1&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGe4VstBMYFvCU8Xfc87yOC1DU8jw>,
>>>>>>>>>    T. leucostaphylum
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/herbsheet.php?id=4506&cat=1>,
>>>>>>>>>    *T. sulcatum
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/herbsheet.php?id=4507&cat=1>*
>>>>>>>>>    - I am not sure if branches are sulcate
>>>>>>>>>    - flowering season doesn't match with *muricatum*, match with
>>>>>>>>>    *sulcatum*, don't have info on *leucostaphylum*
>>>>>>>>>    - leaves in your pics do not have long petiole, whereas
>>>>>>>>>    herbaria of *sulcatum* and *muricatum* show long petioled
>>>>>>>>>    leaves
>>>>>>>>>    - I am not sure if these leaves can be called crenate, as in
>>>>>>>>>    *sulcatum*
>>>>>>>>>    - Wight Icones T 740 has not been referred to *sulcatum*
>>>>>>>>>    - Icones T 740 is related with *muricatum* and *leucostaphylum*
>>>>>>>>>    - T 740 has acuminate leaflets, moderately long petiole
>>>>>>>>>    - I think leaves and inflorescence rather match with Icones T
>>>>>>>>>    28, but branch in that plate is not muricated. T 28 is related to
>>>>>>>>>    *sulcatum* as per FBI
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No need to hurry, first of anything is your study, you do need not
>>>>>>>>> reply any thread right now. I can and will wait until your are done 
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> all your other priorities.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think it's better to to wait for the mature fruits of this plant
>>>>>>>>> if it's in your vicinity.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can download Icones from
>>>>>>>>> http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/92#/summary.
>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile attached here related plates for your perusal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you and best wishes for your upcoming exams.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tetrastigma
>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/v/vitaceae/tetrastigma>
>>>>>>>>>  species in eFloraofindia (with details/ *keys*from published
>>>>>>>>> papers/ regional floras/ FRLHT/ FOI/ Biotik/ efloras/ books etc., 
>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>> ever available)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>> From: Anurag Sharma <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> Date: 27 March 2015 at 20:52
>>>>>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:219386] ANMAR55/77 Please identify this
>>>>>>>>> plant
>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Family: Vitaceae
>>>>>>>>> Date: 24th March 2015
>>>>>>>>> Place: Mullayanagiri, Chikamagalur, Karnataka
>>>>>>>>> Habit: Climber
>>>>>>>>> Habitat: Shola forest
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>>>>>>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
>>>>>>>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource
>>>>>>>>> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of more
>>>>>>>>> than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies,
>>>>>>>>> Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also use 
>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>> for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian
>>>>>>>>> Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest
>>>>>>>>> in the world- more than 2400 members & 2,00,000 messages on 9.9.14) 
>>>>>>>>> or Efloraofindia
>>>>>>>>> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with a
>>>>>>>>> species database of more than 10,000 species & 2,00,000 images). 
>>>>>>>>> Winner
>>>>>>>>> of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common
>>>>>>>>> Birds of India'.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>> Bangalore
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Anurag N. Sharma
> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
> St. Josephs College
> Bangalore
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to