Also check out this GBIF specimen of Artemisia nilagirica https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2610917440 Tabish ------------------------------------------- <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net The waterhole of flower lovers
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 2:24 PM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes Garg ji, > I believe that lack of reporting from south India may be due to > widespread misidentification. If you closely follow the description & the > few correct herbaria, you can see the difference. An example of correct > representation of *Artemisia nilagirica*, will be the images by Sushant > More on GBIF and iNaturalist: > https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/3017958685 > https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/67413716 > In the description of Artemisia nilagirica on FOC > <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200023284>, > the leaves are supposed to have "...segments 1-3 pairs, *ovate or > oblong-ovate*, usually 1- or 2-serrate, acuminate apically." The narrow, > almost linear segments, of the leaves, which are untoothed, of other > plants do not fit this description. > This, coupled with the images of Artemisia dubia on POWO, in my opinion, > makes a strong case for this view. > Tabish > > On Tue, 14 Feb, 2023, 1:24 PM J.M. Garg, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks, Tabish ji, for the feedback. >> But if you see, a lot of observations here ( >> https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/07/artemisia-nilagirica/) are from >> South India, where POWO >> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60475130-2> >> does not give any distribution for A.dubia. >> >> >> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 09:24, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yes, this should be *Artemisia nilagirica*, which is quite a >>> misidentified plant in India. The broad, toothed segments of the leaves are >>> a clear signature. The more common plant with narrow, untoothed leaf >>> segments is *Artemisia dubia*. In fact, all the plants listed on the eFI >>> page for Artemisia nilagarica >>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/ar/asteraceae/asteroideae/anthemideae/artemisia/artemisia-nilagirica> >>> page should belong to *Artemisia dubia*. You can compare with the >>> images of Artemisia dubia at POWO >>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60475130-2>. >>> Tabish >>> On Monday, June 10, 2013 at 8:08:28 PM UTC+5:30 Satish Phadke wrote: >>> >>>> This *Artemisia *plant was photographed in Sinhagad valley. It is >>>> commonly observed in western ghats. >>>> Is it *Artemisia nilagirica*? >>>> Dr Satish Phadke >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/4bb89cb0-7b36-45e0-ab72-33e45f3111a5n%40googlegroups.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/4bb89cb0-7b36-45e0-ab72-33e45f3111a5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CALTV20d2tbojgaV2ehDSsM9fT%3D4iE04t_VN_A%2BfXSFdMbBotWQ%40mail.gmail.com.
