Here are the keys from BSI Flora of India <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=4526&type=3>: 3a. Outer florets female, fertile; disc florets sterile *4* b. Outer female florets and disc florets all fertile *9* 4a. Perennial herbs *5* b. Annual herbs *8* 5a. Heads secund; cauline leaves with stipule like appendages at the base 16. *Artemisia japonica <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=5052&type=4>* b. Heads not secund; cauline leaves without the appendages at the base *6* 6a. Leaves entire, weakly toothed; radical leaves 3-fid or absent 8. *Artemisia dracunculus <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=5043&type=4>* b. Leaves 2 - 3-pinnatisect or pinnatifid, only upper ones entire *7* 7a. Stems pale white; heads in simple or panicled racemes 24. *Artemisia salsoloides <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=5060&type=4>* b. Stems pale green, sometimes purple; heads solitary and distant or in cluster of 2-3-short forming panicled racemes 9. *Artemisia dubia <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=5044&type=4>* 8a. Heads secund; involucral bracts glabrous; achenes narrowly obovate 6. *Artemisia capillaris <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=5041&type=4>* b. Heads not secund; involucral bracts hairy; achenes narrowly obconic 27. *Artemisia stricta <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=5063&type=4>* 9a. Annual or biennial herbs *10* b. Perennial herbs *12* 10a. Small herbs, ca 15-30 cm high; involucral bracts pubescent; heads rather large 4. *Artemisia biennis <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=5039&type=4>* b. Tall herbs, up to 1.2 m high; involucral bracts glabrous; heads small *11* 11a. Heads hemispheric, pedicelled, secund, drooping in axillary leafy racemes 7. *Artemisia caruifolia <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=5042&type=4>* b. Heads ovoid, erect in very dense axillary erect sessile, compound thyrsoid panicles 30. *Artemisia tournefortiana <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=5066&type=4>* 12a. Heads usually small, 1.25-4 mm in diam., often in spreading panicled spikes or racemes *13* b. Heads rather large 4-8 mm in diam. in simple, sparingly branched, erect axillary and terminal racemes *27* 13a. Leaves simple, lobed or serrate *14* b. Leaves pinnatifid, pinnatisect of pinnati-partite *15* 14a. Hoary pubescent or tomentose herbs; leaves ovate-elliptic, lobed; heads ovoid 21. *Artemisia nilagirica <https://efloraindia.bsi.gov.in/eFlora/taxonList.action?id=5057&type=4>*
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 at 16:26, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: > Garg ji, > I did notice that there are a few other type of specimens too for Artemisia > nilagirica at GBIF. However, I believe that those may be > misidentifications. > Tabish > ------------------------------------------- > <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net > The waterhole of flower lovers > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:35 AM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks, Tabish ji. >> If you check in GBIF >> <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3120735>, both types >> of specimens are available. >> Keys between the two may help. >> >> >> On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 14:30, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Also check out this GBIF specimen of Artemisia nilagirica >>> https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2610917440 >>> Tabish >>> ------------------------------------------- >>> <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net >>> The waterhole of flower lovers >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 2:24 PM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes Garg ji, >>>> I believe that lack of reporting from south India may be due to >>>> widespread misidentification. If you closely follow the description & the >>>> few correct herbaria, you can see the difference. An example of correct >>>> representation of *Artemisia nilagirica*, will be the images by >>>> Sushant More on GBIF and iNaturalist: >>>> https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/3017958685 >>>> https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/67413716 >>>> In the description of Artemisia nilagirica on FOC >>>> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200023284>, >>>> the leaves are supposed to have "...segments 1-3 pairs, *ovate or >>>> oblong-ovate*, usually 1- or 2-serrate, acuminate apically." The >>>> narrow, almost linear segments, of the leaves, which are untoothed, of >>>> other plants do not fit this description. >>>> This, coupled with the images of Artemisia dubia on POWO, in my >>>> opinion, makes a strong case for this view. >>>> Tabish >>>> >>>> On Tue, 14 Feb, 2023, 1:24 PM J.M. Garg, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks, Tabish ji, for the feedback. >>>>> But if you see, a lot of observations here ( >>>>> https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/07/artemisia-nilagirica/) are from >>>>> South India, where POWO >>>>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60475130-2> >>>>> does not give any distribution for A.dubia. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 09:24, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, this should be *Artemisia nilagirica*, which is quite a >>>>>> misidentified plant in India. The broad, toothed segments of the leaves >>>>>> are >>>>>> a clear signature. The more common plant with narrow, untoothed leaf >>>>>> segments is *Artemisia dubia*. In fact, all the plants listed on the eFI >>>>>> page for Artemisia nilagarica >>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/ar/asteraceae/asteroideae/anthemideae/artemisia/artemisia-nilagirica> >>>>>> page should belong to *Artemisia dubia*. You can compare with the >>>>>> images of Artemisia dubia at POWO >>>>>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60475130-2> >>>>>> . >>>>>> Tabish >>>>>> On Monday, June 10, 2013 at 8:08:28 PM UTC+5:30 Satish Phadke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> This *Artemisia *plant was photographed in Sinhagad valley. It is >>>>>>> commonly observed in western ghats. >>>>>>> Is it *Artemisia nilagirica*? >>>>>>> Dr Satish Phadke >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/4bb89cb0-7b36-45e0-ab72-33e45f3111a5n%40googlegroups.com >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/4bb89cb0-7b36-45e0-ab72-33e45f3111a5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With regards, >>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFDuaFVE8Q9WSK00KFsjpUYJKmewiObo%2B1YbymCMpEzrrg%40mail.gmail.com.
