Thanks, Tabish ji. If you check in GBIF <https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3120735>, both types of specimens are available. Keys between the two may help.
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 14:30, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: > Also check out this GBIF specimen of Artemisia nilagirica > https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2610917440 > Tabish > ------------------------------------------- > <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net > The waterhole of flower lovers > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 2:24 PM Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes Garg ji, >> I believe that lack of reporting from south India may be due to >> widespread misidentification. If you closely follow the description & the >> few correct herbaria, you can see the difference. An example of correct >> representation of *Artemisia nilagirica*, will be the images by Sushant >> More on GBIF and iNaturalist: >> https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/3017958685 >> https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/67413716 >> In the description of Artemisia nilagirica on FOC >> <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200023284>, >> the leaves are supposed to have "...segments 1-3 pairs, *ovate or >> oblong-ovate*, usually 1- or 2-serrate, acuminate apically." The narrow, >> almost linear segments, of the leaves, which are untoothed, of other >> plants do not fit this description. >> This, coupled with the images of Artemisia dubia on POWO, in my >> opinion, makes a strong case for this view. >> Tabish >> >> On Tue, 14 Feb, 2023, 1:24 PM J.M. Garg, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Tabish ji, for the feedback. >>> But if you see, a lot of observations here ( >>> https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/07/artemisia-nilagirica/) are from >>> South India, where POWO >>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60475130-2> >>> does not give any distribution for A.dubia. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 09:24, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, this should be *Artemisia nilagirica*, which is quite a >>>> misidentified plant in India. The broad, toothed segments of the leaves are >>>> a clear signature. The more common plant with narrow, untoothed leaf >>>> segments is *Artemisia dubia*. In fact, all the plants listed on the eFI >>>> page for Artemisia nilagarica >>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/ar/asteraceae/asteroideae/anthemideae/artemisia/artemisia-nilagirica> >>>> page should belong to *Artemisia dubia*. You can compare with the >>>> images of Artemisia dubia at POWO >>>> <https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60475130-2> >>>> . >>>> Tabish >>>> On Monday, June 10, 2013 at 8:08:28 PM UTC+5:30 Satish Phadke wrote: >>>> >>>>> This *Artemisia *plant was photographed in Sinhagad valley. It is >>>>> commonly observed in western ghats. >>>>> Is it *Artemisia nilagirica*? >>>>> Dr Satish Phadke >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/4bb89cb0-7b36-45e0-ab72-33e45f3111a5n%40googlegroups.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/4bb89cb0-7b36-45e0-ab72-33e45f3111a5n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With regards, >>> J.M.Garg >>> >> -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFCJONGkH3mHa7UPBsFBLLdORA%2Bi2Jzxxvmj5AoUM8%3Dm4g%40mail.gmail.com.
