Hi Usha Di.
I also checked for the paper but sadly the journal is not published online.
I will request our members if they can kindly provide a scanned copy of
the paper for further reference.

Thanks
Tanay


On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Ushadi micromini
<microminipho...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> NO NO NO,
> we will not stop this thread...
> the issues are  not resolved...
>
> First issue is "BLINDLY FOLLOWING THE PLANT LIST"
>
> I looked in the history of THE PLANT LIST yesterday (for a different
> matter)
> what I found has earned my respect...
>
> Its not a run by a flyby nite operation... nor  is it a money grabbing
> operation...
>
> Its a KEW and Missouri Botanical Garden joint venture... both places
> are run by and staffed by
> very scientific .. very correct, very studious, and top of the line
> educated folks... both places... They even rate the names as accepted
> on basis of percentage acceptability, which I thought was very
> honest....
>
>
> MOST OF US including you mr. HS will do  well to start following the
> PLANT list as a basis....
> then...  BASIC RESEARCH HAS its place...
> let the professors of BOTANY and Taxonomy figure out and publish...
>
>
> SECOND ISSUE IS CAN I GET A PDF OF THIS PAPER: Kosteletzkya vitifolia
> (L.) M.R.Almeida & N.Patil J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.93: 111 1996 ...
> which is at the heart of this argument... cant find it on the net...
>
> Thanks Usha di
> ==========
>
>
>
> On Sep 9, 3:25 pm, H S <hemsan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > no problem sirji... i do not have any problem you calling it Hibiscus
> > vitifolia...
> > but i willl follow what i feel is correct..
> >
> > ok.. here we shall stop discussion about this post..
> >
> > regards,,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Dear H S
> >
> > > Please don't make comments like  ......all the members are just blindly
> > > following the Plant list or other sites for identification of plants.
> >
> > > There are many well informed members on the group, who can apply their
> > > judgement in deciding what is correct. We have learnt to respect each
> member
> > > and expect you to follow the same for the sake of this group. Just for
> your
> > > information the following databases treat Hibiscus vitifolius as the
> > > accepted name:
> >
> > >http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=HIVI
> >
> > >http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?19104
> >
> > >http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2850698
> >
> > >http://www.eol.org/pages/584775/overview
> >
> > >http://www.jstor.org/pss/4120636
> >
> > >
> http://www.mozambiqueflora.com/speciesdata/species.php?species_id=139680
> >
> > >http://www.ville-ge.ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/africa/details.php?langue=an&id.
> ..
> >
> > > These are just a few recent ones. Tanay gave you a valid reason, but if
> you
> > > still insist that others are wrong, perhaps we may not be able to do
> any
> > > thing.
> > >      I request again, let us discuss, agree or disagree, but don't
> treat
> > > others as if they don't know any thing. Let us devote our energies
> towards
> > > helping members to know their plants.
> >
> > > --
> > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> > > Retired  Associate Professor
> > > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> > > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> > > Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> > >http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:06 PM, H S <hemsan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> Dear all,
> > >> Apologise if i have hurted anyones sentiments... ...
> >
> > >> and my knowledge is like a drop in a big jar of Dr. Singh and many
> others
> > >> on group.
> >
> > >> though i am proud that whatever i have learnt is in a right
> direction...
> > >> i dont want to pick wrong things from The Plant List... for eg..
> suppose
> > >> Kosteletzkya vitifolia name is unresolved because it doesnt have
> basionym in
> > >> original publication... that doesnt mean that Hibiscus vitifolia
> becames the
> > >> correct name... instead of making Kosteletzkya vitifolia valid by new
> > >> publication or in newly fresh combination with valid publication,,,,
> or it
> > >> has to put on discussion.... all the members are just blindly
> following the
> > >> Plant list or other sites for identification of plants...
> >
> > >> We should not forget the purpose of the group...
> >
> > >> my intention is just contribute to group for bringing plants valid
> correct
> > >> name in front of the world..
> >
> > >> regards,
> >
> > >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Tanay Bose <tanaybos...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> > >>> This what ICBN Vienna Code 2006 Article 33.5 states
> >
> > >>> "33.5. For names published on or after 1 January 1953, errors in the
> > >>> citation of the basionym or replaced synonym, including incorrect
> author
> > >>> citation (Art. 46 <
> http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/frameset/0050Ch4Sec3a046.htm>),
> > >>> but not omissions (Art. 33.4<
> http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/frameset/0037Ch4Sec2a033.htm#33.4.>),
> > >>> do not preclude valid publication of a new combination, new generic
> name
> > >>> with a basionym, or nomen novum."
> >
> > >>> Tanay
> >
> > >>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Tanay Bose <tanaybos...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> > >>>> Dear H.S Ji.
> > >>>> I appreciate your knowledge in plant but I think your way of
> > >>>> reciprocating
> > >>>> to senior colleagues of the group is not quite O.K for me. In
> scientific
> > >>>> community
> > >>>> if you are vehemently protesting some ideas then you should have a
> > >>>> strong evidence
> > >>>> for it. It not us who makes these nomenclatural changes but the
> credit
> > >>>> goes to ICBN.
> > >>>> Kosteletzkya vitifolia (L.) M.R.Almeida & N.Patil J. Bombay Nat.
> Hist.
> > >>>> Soc. 93: 111 1996
> > >>>> is an unresolved name the reason for it is the absence of basionym
> in
> > >>>> the publication.
> > >>>> Hence, the new nomenclatural change doesn't make any effect and the
> old
> > >>>> name or the
> > >>>> basionym i.e. Hibiscus vitifolius L. stays as the the legitimate
> name.
> > >>>> Kindly go through the link provided below.
> >
> > >>>>http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2334897
> >
> > >>>> As a moderator of the group I will request you to be cordial with
> fellow
> > >>>> members of the
> > >>>> group. Though identification of plant is the main aim of our group
> but
> > >>>> we always make sure
> > >>>> that the interaction within the group stays soothing and peaceful.
> No
> > >>>> comments from
> > >>>> any members of the group should hurt the sentiments of others. I
> will
> > >>>> request you to kindly
> > >>>> stick to the group norm and try to help help members
> > >>>> with identification in a bit cordial
> > >>>> manner. Your knowledge in taxonomy is an asset to the group hence we
> > >>>> will always look
> > >>>> to get our knowledge refreshed from your ideas.
> > >>>> forward
> >
> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>>> Tanay
> >
> > >>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:21 PM, H S <hemsan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> this plant doesnt comes under genus Hibiscus.... its different.
> >
> > >>>>> regards,
> >
> > >>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Gurcharan Singh <
> singh...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>> Both GRIN and The Plant List treat Hibiscus vitifolius L. as the
> > >>>>>> accepted name.
> >
> > >>>>>> --
> >
> > >>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> > >>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
> > >>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> > >>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> > >>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> > >>>>>>http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
> >
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:25 AM, H S <hemsan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>> i think Kosteletzkya vitifolia (L.) M.R.Almeida & N.Patil
> > >>>>>>> is correct name for this plant.
> >
> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:03 PM, shrikant ingalhalikar <
> > >>>>>>> le...@rediffmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Involucral bracts are not forked and calyx is not
> prickly/bristly.
> > >>>>>>>> Note the nodding corolla also. This is hence not H. radiatus but
> > >>>>>>>> Fioria vitifolia. Regards, Shrikant
> >
> > >>>>>>>>  On Sep 7, 12:11 pm, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> > More shots of leaves and epicalyx should be helpful. To me it
> does
> > >>>>>>>> not look
> > >>>>>>>> > like H. radiatus.
> >
> > >>>>>>>> > --
> > >>>>>>>> > Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> > >>>>>>>> > Retired  Associate Professor
> > >>>>>>>> > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> > >>>>>>>> > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> > >>>>>>>> > Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> > >>>>>>>>http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
> >
> > >>>>>>>> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Narendra Joshi <
> > >>>>>>>> narend...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> > > Hibiscus radiatus
> >
> > >>>>>>>> > > --
> > >>>>>>>> > > With Regards,
> > >>>>>>>> > > Narendra Joshi- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > >>>>>>>> > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>  - H.S.
> >
> > >>>>>>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere
> > >>>>>>> heart of stone
> >
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>>  - H.S.
> >
> > >>>>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere
> heart
> > >>>>> of stone
> >
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> *Tanay Bose*
> > >>>> Research Assistant & Teaching Assistant.
> > >>>> Department of Botany.
> > >>>> University of British Columbia .
> > >>>> 3529-6270 University Blvd.
> > >>>> Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 (Canada)
> > >>>> Phone: 778-323-4036 (Mobile)
> > >>>>            604-822-2019 (Lab)
> > >>>>            604-822-6089  (Fax)
> > >>>> ta...@interchange.ubc.ca
> > >>>> *Webpages:*
> > >>>>http://www.botany.ubc.ca/people/mberbee.html
> > >>>>http://www.botany.ubc.ca/people/gradstud.html
> > >>>>https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/
> >
> > >>> --
> > >>> *Tanay Bose*
> > >>> Research Assistant & Teaching Assistant.
> > >>> Department of Botany.
> > >>> University of British Columbia .
> > >>> 3529-6270 University Blvd.
> > >>> Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 (Canada)
> > >>> Phone: 778-323-4036 (Mobile)
> > >>>            604-822-2019 (Lab)
> > >>>            604-822-6089  (Fax)
> > >>> ta...@interchange.ubc.ca
> > >>> *Webpages:*
> > >>>http://www.botany.ubc.ca/people/mberbee.html
> > >>>http://www.botany.ubc.ca/people/gradstud.html
> > >>>https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/
> >
> > >> --
> > >>  - H.S.
> >
> > >> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere
> heart of
> > >> stone
> >
> > --
> >  - H.S.
> >
> > A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart
> of
> > stone
>



-- 
*Tanay Bose*
Research Assistant & Teaching Assistant.
Department of Botany.
University of British Columbia .
3529-6270 University Blvd.
Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 (Canada)
Phone: 778-323-4036 (Mobile)
           604-822-2019 (Lab)
           604-822-6089  (Fax)
ta...@interchange.ubc.ca
*Webpages:*
http://www.botany.ubc.ca/people/mberbee.html
http://www.botany.ubc.ca/people/gradstud.html
https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/

Reply via email to