Atro Tossavainen wrote:
>
>Perhaps some kind soul with source could compile afsd on ANY Linux
>against glibc 2.0 and contrib the results, if it's okay with Pittsburgh.

This is a significant part of the problem.  The pointy-haired types now making 
decisions at Transarc/IBM have said that one customer can't build something like this 
and make it available to the afs community.

Dave

Reply via email to