Atro Tossavainen wrote: > >Perhaps some kind soul with source could compile afsd on ANY Linux >against glibc 2.0 and contrib the results, if it's okay with Pittsburgh. This is a significant part of the problem. The pointy-haired types now making decisions at Transarc/IBM have said that one customer can't build something like this and make it available to the afs community. Dave
- afs and linux 2.2.16 David Thompson
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Ken Hornstein
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Paul Blackburn
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Atro Tossavainen
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 David Thompson
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Patrick Lathrop
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Paul Blackburn
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Atro Tossavainen
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 David Thompson
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Gerhard Gonter
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Glew, Andy
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Esther Filderman
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Dr A V Le Blanc
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Christopher Lindsey
