> When you can get CODA to work, it seems to be rock solid. Unfortunately > there are no really adequate sysadmin tools, and a number of problems > (here, anyway) with upgrading from one version to another. I have > been impressed by CODA's resilience, but I don't think AFS will > be threatened by it for a while. You're also pretty limited in OS availability. CODA is great for Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, and Windows, but if you throw IRIX, HP/UX, or other less common unices into the mix then you're out of luck. Here's the URL: http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/ It does support Kerberos V authentication and disconnected operation, though. Chris
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 David Thompson
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Patrick Lathrop
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Paul Blackburn
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Atro Tossavainen
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 David Thompson
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Gerhard Gonter
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Glew, Andy
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Esther Filderman
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Dr A V Le Blanc
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Christopher Lindsey
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Ken Hornstein
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Russ Allbery
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Dug Song
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 peter honeyman
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 deadbeat
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Jimmy Engelbrecht
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Russ Allbery
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
