According to Paul Blackburn: > [...] > IBM would be "killing the golden goose" if it did not listen to its > AFS customers and respond to their business needs. IMO, that more or less describes what IBM/Transarc has been doing for some time now. In fact, they even seem to avoid having new customers. BSD and Linux users are possibly better off if they use arla: http://www.stacken.kth.se/projekt/arla/ +gg -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +43/1/31336/702 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zentrum fuer Informatikdienste, Wirtschaftsuniversitaet Wien, Austria
- afs and linux 2.2.16 David Thompson
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Ken Hornstein
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Paul Blackburn
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Atro Tossavainen
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 David Thompson
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Patrick Lathrop
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Paul Blackburn
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Atro Tossavainen
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 David Thompson
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Gerhard Gonter
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Glew, Andy
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Esther Filderman
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Dr A V Le Blanc
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Christopher Lindsey
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Ken Hornstein
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Russ Allbery
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Dug Song
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 peter honeyman
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 deadbeat
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Jimmy Engelbrecht
