Esther Filderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: __________ >Occasionally some people make mumbles about another CMU project, CODA, being a >potential AFS replacement, but I've heard internal-CMU rumblings that it'll >never be a polished product, either. Not by CMU's Coda group --- but that implies that someone else could take their work and turn it into a production-quality system. Coda is, after all, a research project at CMU; the researchers aren't interested in making a product out of it, but making the code available is an open invitation to all comers to do so. -- brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,japh [EMAIL PROTECTED] system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt,cyrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Glew, Andy
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Esther Filderman
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Dr A V Le Blanc
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Christopher Lindsey
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Ken Hornstein
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Russ Allbery
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Dug Song
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 peter honeyman
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 deadbeat
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Jimmy Engelbrecht
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Russ Allbery
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Nathan J. Williams
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Glew, Andy
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Atro Tossavainen
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Russ Allbery
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Harald Barth
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Paul Blackburn
