Glew, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are there any other similar wide-area filesystem technologies? No. That's why they've gotten away with doing what they're doing. > DFS, sure maybe, but I have never understood why our support guys > consistently refuse to look that way. We've run DFS. I'd rather go back to NFS and a fragmented file system than try to do that again. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Paul Blackburn
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Atro Tossavainen
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 David Thompson
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Gerhard Gonter
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Glew, Andy
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Esther Filderman
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Dr A V Le Blanc
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Christopher Lindsey
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Ken Hornstein
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Russ Allbery
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Dug Song
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 peter honeyman
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 deadbeat
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Jimmy Engelbrecht
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Russ Allbery
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
- Re: afs and linux 2.2.16 Nathan J. Williams
- RE: afs and linux 2.2.16 Glew, Andy
