>I would say the sexuality debate keeps on going because there's a >conflict between those who see the message as black and white and >incapable of being interpreted in any other way, and those who believe >that the "orthodox" interpretation of the message falls short of meeting >people where they're at.
That may not cover everybody. I think there are some things on which people would argue the context has not changed. For example, that adultery is by and large adultery; then and now - it's a no-no. I think some people make the same judgement regards homosexuality. In their view, nothing has changed sufficiently to justify a different position. - Greg ------------------------------------------------------ - You are subscribed to the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the message body 'unsubscribe insights-l' (ell, not one (1)) See: http://nsw.uca.org.au/insights-l-information.htm ------------------------------------------------------
