As an old Intermapper (Mac) user and as network engineer I am also using a
lot of different products so I can adapt and compare!!
Fact of life is that (Mac) traditional is much faster in performance and
use (less steps) that so logically I prefer the more efficient version.
Also I must buy faster Mac-hardware fore the server version.
Happily is there a good interaction with the intermapper developers and
users and they are doing there utmost to built the Mac advantage in the new
system.
Hans Heger RIVM the Netherlands
|-------------------------------------->
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Sent by: |
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| tware.com> |
| |
| |
| 03-06-2006 06:33 |
| |
| |
| Please respond to |
| "InterMapper Discussion" |
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| tware.com> |
| |
|-------------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
|
|
|
To|
| "InterMapper Discussion" <[email protected]>
|
|
cc|
|
|
|
Subject|
| Re: [IM-Talk] Re: Traditional vs New interface
|
|
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
At 9:57 PM -0500 6/2/06, Szymon Lobocki wrote:
>That's what folks are talking about, because many of them have trouble
>adopting to the new product after using the old product for years.
>Basically Dartware and these customers are trying to iron things out
>to keep the best of both worlds.
That's it exactly.
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
