Jakob Peterhänsel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> "... less steps..."
> Ain't this a simple(?) all-round issue in general? Handling 2-10 maps  
> and sub-100 devices is OK, but then it starts to get complicated.
> My test server has about 130 maps with 1300 devices monitored, and I  
> have to admit that changing notifications and other essential  
> settings per-device is very time-consuming and not that easy.
> If any work should be done, it should not be a 'simple port' of what  
> has-been in IM Traditional - it should be invested in the right power- 
> GUI for managing large installations... if you ask me. ;-)


Very well said. Map Status probes are a step in the right direction.
Hierarchies of dependencies without duplicate notifications would be ideal.

Don't call the new version InterMapper Pro!  ;-)

rb
_________________________________________________________
This mail sent using V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.org

____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to