Hi All,
As a long time user, I will have to agree on some of these points,
but also differentiate on them a bit...
"...much faster..."
Well, the Java IMR on Mac loads way slower than the IMR version on
WinXP, but once it's loaded I don't see much of a difference in raw
response time.
"... less steps..."
Ain't this a simple(?) all-round issue in general? Handling 2-10 maps
and sub-100 devices is OK, but then it starts to get complicated.
My test server has about 130 maps with 1300 devices monitored, and I
have to admit that changing notifications and other essential
settings per-device is very time-consuming and not that easy.
If any work should be done, it should not be a 'simple port' of what
has-been in IM Traditional - it should be invested in the right power-
GUI for managing large installations... if you ask me. ;-)
I'm sure next time we see a new release of IM(+R) effort will show in
enhanced GUI along with whatever new features the Dartware team has
weighted most important to us all..
Now, it's time to go offline and get ready for the Depeche Mode
concert tomorrow... ;-)
Best,
Jakob Peterhänsel
"Be a part of the Love Generation - carry a smile, not a gun."
- JP, May 2006
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: Marook
Phone: +45 22684961
On 06/06/2006, at 10:56, Hans Heger wrote:
As an old Intermapper (Mac) user and as network engineer I am also
using a
lot of different products so I can adapt and compare!!
Fact of life is that (Mac) traditional is much faster in
performance and
use (less steps) that so logically I prefer the more efficient
version.
Also I must buy faster Mac-hardware fore the server version.
Happily is there a good interaction with the intermapper developers
and
users and they are doing there utmost to built the Mac advantage in
the new
system.
Hans Heger RIVM the Netherlands
|-------------------------------------->
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Sent by: |
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| tware.com> |
| |
| |
| 03-06-2006 06:33 |
| |
| |
| Please respond to |
| "InterMapper Discussion" |
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| tware.com> |
| |
|-------------------------------------->
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
|
|
|
|
|
To|
| "InterMapper Discussion" <InterMapper-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
|
cc|
|
|
|
Subject|
| Re: [IM-Talk] Re: Traditional vs New
interface
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------|
At 9:57 PM -0500 6/2/06, Szymon Lobocki wrote:
That's what folks are talking about, because many of them have
trouble
adopting to the new product after using the old product for years.
Basically Dartware and these customers are trying to iron things out
to keep the best of both worlds.
That's it exactly.
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
