Hi Derick,
In any case, I don't mind this — I'm actually going to suggest to change
> the constructor to:
>
> public function __construct(DateTimeInterface $start, DateInterval
> $interval, DateTimeInterface|int $end, int $options = 0) {}
>
> And then *only* add:
>
> public static function createFromISO8601String(string $specification, int
> $options = 0): static {}
>
> This solves the original problem of not being able to define the
> signatures in stubs, and also extracts the most problematic of methods
> into a factory method where it should always have belonged.
>
Thanks for your response, I've just updated the RFC accordingly. It solves
the main issue indeed, and we still have the possibility to
add a second factory method using the $recurrences parameter later if we
deem it useful at some point.
With all that said, I don't want to update the RFC anymore, so I plan to
start the vote on Monday.
Regards,
Máté
