Hi all, On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: > >> > FWIW, as someone who did play with the patch (both patches, of course), >> > I'm not sure why people are claiming you don't understand the RFC. Your >> > comments in the code are 100% accurate, which means you understood >> > exactly how it works. >> >> Josh Di Fabio just pointed out to me that the code in question wasn't >> actually written by you but by Dennis Birkholz, so my statement was >> incorrect. >> Still, from what you said it appears to me you still understood the >> behavior >> but disagreed with it. I know that at least on my end, that was >> definitely >> the case. > > > Yes and I fully agree. > > Anyway, unlike your proposal, I have to advocate users not to use type hint > for database INT8, JSON numeric, etc. It will be tough job... > Anyone who are willing to use type hint for any data that has integer/float form, you still have chance to vote to 'yes' for https://wiki.php.net/rfc/coercive_sth Weak mode can be coercive. Coercive mode works better with my type affinity proposal also. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/introduce-type-affinity Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
