On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:01 AM Zeev Suraski <z...@php.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:14 PM G. P. B. <george.bany...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 16:53, Zeev Suraski <z...@php.net> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:19 PM Dan Ackroyd <dan...@basereality.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Please stop doing this. > >> > >> I will gladly do so, once the project starts behaving responsibly again. > >> > > > > Honnestly, this comment right here Zeev just makes me want to not > > compromise at all. > > I think you seriously lost any hope there was that I'm going to put back > > this to a vote. > > > > In retrospect, I should have waited for Dan's insulting message to wear off > before replying to it. > > The fact the RFC included a confusing secondary vote, that was defined > against our RFC rules and may have been misunderstood by folks who voted > (and consequently may have resulted in different outcomes) - is sufficient > grounds to disqualify this vote and require a restarted vote on a fixed RFC > (that can include the amendments you have in mind to make the 8.0 behavior > different from what the RFC proposed). > > Zeev
I read our voting rules, checked with a few people, and thought about it for a while, and I still do not know what rule breakage you are referring to. How did this supposedly break our voting rules? If you want any support on disqualifying this RFC, you need to clearly state the violation. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
