[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Just some comments for clarifying some stuff that keeps coming up
> repeatedly:
>
> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >
> > This is a very unfair comment. Diffserv is just fine in the
> > case of unencrypted traffic. It has a problem (and so does
> > intserv I suspect) with tunnel or transport mode ESP.
> >
>
> IPv4 intserv shares the same difficulty of doing MF-classification with ESP.
> However, in IPv6 the flow label can be used in MF-classification for intserv
> semantics, even when ESP is used.
This is incorrect. RFC 2207 defines a way to classify
ESP traffic for intserv *and* it doesn't compromise
privacy. What's being floated here for diffserv requires
that I compromise privacy in order to work, which I
think is bogus.
Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
