[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12895095#action_12895095
 ] 

HBase Review Board commented on HBASE-2697:
-------------------------------------------

Message from: [email protected]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/484/#review646
-----------------------------------------------------------


I only got to first file and didn't even finish that... will do more later


branches/0.90_master_rewrite/BRANCH_TODO.txt
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/484/#comment2424>

    Why not let it be on the heartbeat? We have to have a handler for case 
where it does not make it across anyways?  Or is it because there is no longer 
a mechanism for taking action on heartbeat other than the passing of server 
load?



branches/0.90_master_rewrite/BRANCH_TODO.txt
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/484/#comment2425>

    Disable/Enable has to be sloppy and allow splits to come in.  You could set 
a disabling flag in zk but there'd be a race between the "point of no return", 
the updating of meta that parent is offlined, and checking flag in zk.



branches/0.90_master_rewrite/BRANCH_TODO.txt
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/484/#comment2426>

    Do the old ones works still?



branches/0.90_master_rewrite/BRANCH_TODO.txt
<http://review.cloudera.org/r/484/#comment2427>

    Nah


- stack





> Implement new open/close logic in handlers and stop using heartbeats for 
> open/close messages
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2697
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2697
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: ipc, master, regionserver
>            Reporter: Jonathan Gray
>            Assignee: Jonathan Gray
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.90.0
>
>
> This issue is doing the meat of what HBASE-2485 is about and continues what 
> was started in HBASE-2694 after some code cleanup to make life easier.
> This deals with no longer piggybacking messages from Master to RegionServers 
> on heartbeat responses and instead sending direct unsolicited messages.  This 
> also deals with moving the open/close logic fully into handlers and removing 
> the existing open/close code on both the RS and M sides.  There may also be 
> some changes to the master in-memory state of regions in transition.  The new 
> load balancer will probably be introduced with this issue but not fully 
> integrated yet.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to