I am wondering if there could be a formalized and supported (=logistical resources?) for customers to get to create their own branches - so they can make up their own schedules and plans and decide which "stable release" version of a TizenIVI release to snapshot as their "alpha and move towards production".
...alan -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Abramski, Adam M Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 3:06 AM To: Graydon, Tracy; Zheng, Yanshuang; VanCutsem, Geoffroy; Ylinen, Mikko Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: Tizen IVI repositories enabled by default in the image Comments in line -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Graydon, Tracy Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 11:55 AM To: Zheng, Yanshuang; VanCutsem, Geoffroy; Ylinen, Mikko Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Tizen IVI repositories enabled by default in the image This is a perfect time to re-ask the question that Geoffroy asked the other day... Should we change the default repo to be daily instead of snapshots? If QA is testing daily images against snapshot repos because that is the default, that's a good argument for changing the default to daily. The question then becomes: how do our customers use the daily images? I am willing to bet they really don't want the bleeding (possibly broken) edge. In fact, the official stance is that, in general, we don't really want anyone other than developers using snapshots. The are there for engineering and development use and convenience. Customers and others use them at their own risk. Adam - I would agree with both of these comments. Based on that assumptionŠassuming it is validŠI think we should default to daily instead. Anyone think differently? Thoughts? On 8/16/13 2:57 AM, "Zheng, Yanshuang" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > [Yanshuang] 'zypper up' is tested but at a weekly basis instead of >> > daily. Often QA install the latest daily build in last week(e.g. US >> > Thursday) and then test 'zypper up' on this Thursday or Friday(PRC). >> > That is to ensure system upgrade to latest snapshot could be >> > conducted smoothly and the upgrade won't break system startup. > >> Thanks for confirming this Yanshuang. Wouldn't it make more sense to >>test updates to the latest daily build instead of snapshot? Correct >>me if I'm wrong but snapshot could be pretty broken so it could make >>it hard to verify whether it's the build itself which is broken or >>the upgrade process? >> > >[Yanshuang] "upgrade to latest snapshot" is because, currently the >default enabled repo for all daily releases is the snapshot repo. >QA test this without any repo re-configuration, assuming changing repo >configuration is not a common case for general users. >We are OK to test against daily repo if there is kinds of feedback from >customers. >And if the default enabled repo is switched to the daily one, our >'zypper up' would test the upgrade against daily repo. >_______________________________________________ >IVI mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi _______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi _______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi _______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
