Hi Gents,

I'm *very* new to Tizen/IVI, so I'm still finding my way around, but...

*... a formalized and supported (=logistical resources?) for customers to
get to create their own branches ...*


I thought the idea of git was that an organization should make a local
master repository and do their own work against that repository, updating
to the project master as they have proven additions and fixes?

Is there a Best Practices document that describes how to use the Tizen
repository together and what the work flow should look like?

TIA,
Paul


Kind Regards

Paul Hanchett

-------------------
Infotainment Engineer
MSX on behalf of Jaguar Land Rover
One World Trade Center, 121 Southwest Salmon Street, 11th Floor, Portland,
Oregon, 97204

Email: [email protected]
-------------------

Business Details:
Jaguar Land Rover Limited
Registered Office: Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry CV3 4LF
Registered in England No: 1672070


On 16 August 2013 19:04, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I am wondering if there could be a formalized and supported (=logistical
> resources?) for customers to get to create their own branches - so they can
> make up their own schedules and plans and decide which "stable release"
> version of a TizenIVI release to snapshot as their "alpha and move towards
> production".
>
> ...alan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Abramski, Adam M
> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 3:06 AM
> To: Graydon, Tracy; Zheng, Yanshuang; VanCutsem, Geoffroy; Ylinen, Mikko
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Tizen IVI repositories enabled by default in the image
>
> Comments in line
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Graydon, Tracy
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 11:55 AM
> To: Zheng, Yanshuang; VanCutsem, Geoffroy; Ylinen, Mikko
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Tizen IVI repositories enabled by default in the image
>
> This is a perfect time to re-ask the question that Geoffroy asked the
> other day...
>
> Should we change the default repo to be daily instead of snapshots? If QA
> is testing daily images against snapshot repos because that is the default,
> that's a good argument for changing the default to daily.
>
> The question then becomes: how do our customers use the daily images? I am
> willing to bet they really don't want the bleeding (possibly broken) edge.
> In fact, the official stance is that, in general, we don't really want
> anyone other than developers using snapshots. The are there for engineering
> and development use and convenience. Customers and others use them at their
> own risk.
>
> Adam - I would agree with both of these comments.
>
> Based on that assumptionÅ assuming it is validÅ I think we should default to
> daily instead.
>
> Anyone think differently? Thoughts?
>
>
>
> On 8/16/13 2:57 AM, "Zheng, Yanshuang" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > [Yanshuang] 'zypper up' is tested but at a weekly basis instead of
> >> > daily. Often QA install the latest daily build in last week(e.g. US
> >> > Thursday) and then test 'zypper up' on this Thursday or Friday(PRC).
> >> > That is to ensure system upgrade to latest snapshot could be
> >> > conducted smoothly and the upgrade won't break system startup.
> >
> >> Thanks for confirming this Yanshuang. Wouldn't it make more sense to
> >>test  updates to the latest daily build instead of snapshot? Correct
> >>me if I'm wrong  but snapshot could be pretty broken so it could make
> >>it hard to verify whether  it's the build itself which is broken or
> >>the upgrade process?
> >>
> >
> >[Yanshuang] "upgrade to latest snapshot" is because, currently the
> >default enabled repo for all daily releases is the snapshot repo.
> >QA test this without any repo re-configuration, assuming changing repo
> >configuration is not a common case for general users.
> >We are OK to test against daily repo if there is kinds of feedback from
> >customers.
> >And if the default enabled repo is switched to the daily one, our
> >'zypper up' would test the upgrade against daily repo.
> >_______________________________________________
> >IVI mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
>
> _______________________________________________
> IVI mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
> _______________________________________________
> IVI mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
> _______________________________________________
> IVI mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
>
_______________________________________________
IVI mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi

Reply via email to