Hi Albert,
a.faber wrote: > Also the NT1SYNC for the 16f722 family does not seem to be correct, > > var volatile bit T1CON_T1SYNC at T1CON : 2 > > T1CON_T1SYNC should be T1CON_NT1SYNC ? > > Looking in the inc file for 16f722 there is the NOT > NOT_T1SYNC EQU H'0002' > > Looking for example to the 16f72.jal file seems to be correct > > var volatile bit T1CON_NT1SYNC at T1CON : 2 > On one hand T1SYNC in the device file for the 16F722 matches its datasheet, but NT1SYNC seems more common (abbreviation for T1CON_NOT-T1SYNC?). So we better normalize to NTSYNC, even though it doesn't match the datasheet for some PICs (consider it as an error in the datasheet?). Similarly for T3SYNC: NT3SYNC is much more common (while T5SYNC does not occur at all, only NT5SYNC). Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
