Hi Albert,
a.faber wrote: > But why is the T2CON reg still defined? Isn't better to remove the T2CON reg > definition afterall if there is not Timer2 present? Don't ask me! Ask Microchip (or read the datasheet). I just 'copy' what is in the MPLAB .dev files (and make some corrections) without asking why ;-) Of course I could remove Timer2 registers from the device files of these PICs, but is that the right thing to do? Timer2 is present, but according to the datasheet not supposed to be touched, but also not absolutely forbidden to be touched! Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
