{sorry sent prematurely)
Hi Guys,
I appreciate your opinion/vote about proposed changes in device files
for the timer library Albert is designing. There are a number of
inconsistencies in MPLAB for the naming of some bit fields in timer
control registers.
You can read it back in the Jallib, but to summarize:
1. Rename 'T1SYNC' of T1CON to 'NT1SYNC' for the 16F72x.
Later we found also that a number 18Fs have T1SYNC, T3SYNC
which should better be NT1SYNC and NT3SYNC for consistency
even when the datasheet specifies T1SYNC (with an overscore
to indicated 'not').
2. For many (18F) PICs the T2OUTPS field of T2CON is declared as
T2OUTPS. For some PICS it is declared as TOUTPS, while the
datasheets specify T2OUTPS. Since the datasheet prevails I
proposed to correct this deviation:
rename TOUTPS to T2OUTPS for T2CON
more generally rename TOUTPS of TxCON to TxOUTPS
(x any number, for PICs with more of such timers).
But the midrange PICS have only one Timer with TOUTPS field
(Timer2) and the datasheets seem consistently calling it TOUTPS.
So if we normalize to T2SYNC for consistence it is in conflict
with the datasheet.
Questions:
1. Do we vote for NT1SYNC (item 1 above)?
2. Do we vote for consistent TxOUTPS for the 18Fs?
3. Do we vote for T2OUTPS for the baseline PICs?
If you don't care Albert is free to find a solution for the timer
library and I'll make the necessary adjustments in the device files.
Regards, Rob.
--
Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
