I do not wish to split community's, bringing community's together is the idea. How is the question, people like the way they are. Keeping everyone happy is the most important thing. There are ways to do so.
Having a community on the website depends on interest, I don't see there being a community on the website for a long time if there is ever one. Matt. On Oct 31, 7:10 am, funlw65 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I think more data for analysis are required so, I will share my google > analytics over one month period of time. I have a site about green > energy, electronics, etc. and I have very little traffic on it, > until ... this arduino/jaluino/pinguino/freejalduino thing. > > Look here:http://picasaweb.google.com/funlw65/Jalmarket?feat=directlink > > Please look at referrers, keywords, and what countries are interested > in an arduino pic based board. > > Can be this an opportunity for jalv2 and jallib? I think it is but we > must move fast. I think we need also a standard forum (I was against > this) to grow a community. Look at mikroe.com, swordfish basic, > picaxe, etc. all are using popular buletin > > What do you think? > > Vasi > > On Oct 31, 11:03 am, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > 2009/10/30 mattschinkel <[email protected]> > > > > > I think a large community is better than a nice website and funlw65 > > > > gave me the minimum to start with JAL ( IDE and compiler version ). > > > > In the future, there is a possibility of a large community on the > > > website. The community will remain here unless we do a good job and > > > please others with our work. > > > The community used to be at the jallist. Nowdays it is partly there, partly > > here. The website couls be a third place. > > This is why I think it is important to use this list strictly for > > development and the jallist for use (although they can't be separated that > > stictly, since compiler issue's have impact on both). Do I understand that > > the website will also have a community? What would be it's relation to > > jallist and jallib group? And how do we avoid scattering our community > > around? > > > > We are in a way, in competition with C and other languages and ATMEL > > > who seem to be more popular then JALv2. > > > > These other languages are quite popular, but non of them have a decent > > > website with all documentation, many tutorials, contributer tools, > > > etc. (all organized in one place). > > > I wonder what 'other languages' you refer to. > > But if we see that they are popular without a website, then that's an > > indication a website is not that important. > > However, as said before, IMHO it is good to have one place for the jal > > stuff. Having an other place, next to the many there are already, is a bad > > thing. > > > And about JAL vs C. C is a long-exsiting standard, available for many > > (almost all) platforms and (at least) as suitable for the job as Jal is. > > IMHO JAL survived is the re-write of Kyle and the absence of a gnu C > > compiler for pic's with a set of libs like jallib. Or to put it an other > > way: there are (commercial) C compilers for pic's, but somehow jal + jallib > > provides better support, worth learning a new language. That 'better > > support' must be our strenght. > > > Joep- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
