Hi guys, I think more data for analysis are required so, I will share my google analytics over one month period of time. I have a site about green energy, electronics, etc. and I have very little traffic on it, until ... this arduino/jaluino/pinguino/freejalduino thing.
Look here: http://picasaweb.google.com/funlw65/Jalmarket?feat=directlink Please look at referrers, keywords, and what countries are interested in an arduino pic based board. Can be this an opportunity for jalv2 and jallib? I think it is but we must move fast. I think we need also a standard forum (I was against this) to grow a community. Look at mikroe.com, swordfish basic, picaxe, etc. all are using popular buletin What do you think? Vasi On Oct 31, 11:03 am, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > 2009/10/30 mattschinkel <[email protected]> > > > > > > I think a large community is better than a nice website and funlw65 > > > gave me the minimum to start with JAL ( IDE and compiler version ). > > > In the future, there is a possibility of a large community on the > > website. The community will remain here unless we do a good job and > > please others with our work. > > The community used to be at the jallist. Nowdays it is partly there, partly > here. The website couls be a third place. > This is why I think it is important to use this list strictly for > development and the jallist for use (although they can't be separated that > stictly, since compiler issue's have impact on both). Do I understand that > the website will also have a community? What would be it's relation to > jallist and jallib group? And how do we avoid scattering our community > around? > > > We are in a way, in competition with C and other languages and ATMEL > > who seem to be more popular then JALv2. > > > These other languages are quite popular, but non of them have a decent > > website with all documentation, many tutorials, contributer tools, > > etc. (all organized in one place). > > I wonder what 'other languages' you refer to. > But if we see that they are popular without a website, then that's an > indication a website is not that important. > However, as said before, IMHO it is good to have one place for the jal > stuff. Having an other place, next to the many there are already, is a bad > thing. > > And about JAL vs C. C is a long-exsiting standard, available for many > (almost all) platforms and (at least) as suitable for the job as Jal is. > IMHO JAL survived is the re-write of Kyle and the absence of a gnu C > compiler for pic's with a set of libs like jallib. Or to put it an other > way: there are (commercial) C compilers for pic's, but somehow jal + jallib > provides better support, worth learning a new language. That 'better > support' must be our strenght. > > Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
