Hi Vasile,

Thanks for your feedback, I'll look into this in the next [days|weeks|...].
I'll fill an issue.
And thanks for the cognac :)

Cheers,
Seb



2010/3/13 vasile surducan <[email protected]>

>
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:28 PM, vasile surducan <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:21 PM, mattschinkel 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> We have now updated The Tutorial Book to version 0.3
>>>
>>> This book is available as a PDF file, you can download it from jallib
>>> project page: http://jallib.googlecode.com/files/Tutorial_Book_0.3.pdf
>>>
>>>
>> I've read it quite fast. It will become a good tutorial book, however
>> there are a few things which maybe you'll try to modify on next versions:
>>
>> 1. page 51, you refer to "plenty resources" and the link goes to google
>> search page for "i2c". It suppose a reader of this tutorial knows to search
>> on google using keywords, else he never find the tutorial itself... "this
>> page"  is a very good resource, however maybe deserve a full name, so the
>> reader remember next time where is going.
>> 2. the unnamed figure (btw, any image, formula or table should have a
>> name, so you can refer at it in the tutorial text or talking about it on
>> email) from page 52 has a low resolution, try to use at least 300dpi when
>> export bitmap from eagle and convert it in grayscale, it's much better
>> visible
>> 3. on page 53 two pictures repeat (they aren't numbered as well), in one
>> of them you point at some resistors without naming those resistors as R4 and
>> R3 (I've told you this last time too), on every schematic or image, being a
>> tutorial, the reader does not need to guess the component numbers or where
>> is pin 1 of the IC.
>>
>> There are more issues, but If you'll try to add at least numbers to the
>> figures and refer in text to the schematics and image numbers when
>> explaining something, will start looking as a tutorial.
>>
>>
>> Going further:
>
> 4. page 97 three irrelevant pictures on a whole page
> 5. page 98 table on the top of the page (please add a table number) is
> talking about V5 (which is known in literature as VS or contrast voltage)
> and on the "remark" colums it says variable which is correct but
> 6. on page 99 where is a schematic, the V5 becomes Vee (there is
> inconsistancy in table, schematics and probably in the book text). VS could
> be a -2.5...-5V output on many LCD, so you're telling to the beginner to
> kill his toy... VS should be connect in the worst circumstances with a
> resistor to ground. There are LCDs which need positive voltage around +2V on
> VS for a good contrast. The universal solution is a potmeter of 10-20K
> connected with wiper on the VS pin1 to +5V and pin3 to Vee (where Vee is a
> negative voltage). If LCD does need negative voltage, pin3 is connected to
> GND. See here a picture:
> http://webspace.webring.com/people/dv/vsurducan/electro/PIC/f877.html
>
> On your schematic is missing the reset capacitor from RA5 to GND and the
> 100nF near the PIC supply and another 100nF near the LCD supply.
> 7. picture from page 100 should go on page 99
> 8. picture from page 101and 102 seems irelevant to me
>
> Even Seb will be angry with me, the purpose of a good book is not filling
> it;s pages with huge pictures, when you're drinking a french cognac, you
> need a small quantity, but with the best taste ever...
> :)
>
> Vasile
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jallib" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<jallib%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
>



-- 
Sébastien Lelong
http://www.sirloon.net
http://sirbot.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.

Reply via email to