[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I think it also worth mentioning that Java is barely 2 years old. Just because
> we are used to working with developed languages like C, C++ or whatever else
> tickles your fancy - that doesn't mean we can forcefully matriculate Java to
> suit our time frame.
I agree that Java hasn't had time to mature, but I've been using _1.1_
for almost 2 years, are you sure you have your timelines right ?
> I honestly believe that Sun is doing the right thing at the moment (but that
> isn't hard, because anyone who files an action against Microsoft is doing the
> right thing! :>). Sure there is a pile of bug fixes to get through, sure there
> might be a bit of the '1001 API' syndrome, but it's still early days.
>
> You don't force a newborn baby to walk before they've crawled...
Remeber Java is evolutionary not revolutionary. java is more an
improvement on C++ then a completely new way of doing things. You're
right that we shouldn't expect to much too soon, but just how long iare
we supposed to wait, with one company controlling the process I don't
expect progress to be very quick.
> It isn't a perfected language yet, but it just keeps getting better, and I'm
> definately going to stick with it.
>
> James
It does indeed, and so am I.
Maksim.
--
Remember Darwin; building a better mousetrap merely results in smarter
mice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
