Yeah, I hadn't progressed that far into the episode yet, but if the
java community was as sensitive as CKoerner we'd all have committed
suicide by now.


On Jul 25, 2:25 am, TorNorbye <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this thread made it sound as though Ruby got ripped to shreds
> in our podcast -- and that's far from the case. I chose it as one of
> the two languages I would bring to a desert island!   Dick and I
> disagree about active record - in particular I think JPA itself is not
> nearly as elegant as Active Record (with the caveat that for
> connecting to existing stuff it's good).   But I think Ruby the
> language gets a lot of respect - there's a bunch of things I like in
> there, many that I missed in Python (when I worked on NetBeans Python
> support after the Ruby support), and many I want to see added in a
> future Java - such as heredocs (<<), regexp (and other) literals, and #
> {} expression nesting in strings (JavaFX luckily has this one). One
> thing I think Python got right was to embed documentations as program
> elements (strings) rather than comments, but I'm not as fond as Dick
> of the indentation-based syntax.
>
> (It -is- true that the lack of a spec is a problem. Somebody pointed
> to a spec but that's really a wiki in progress, started just a couple
> of years ago and the language is as old as Java. As a user it probably
> isn't a big deal, but for alternate implementation implementers, and
> for tools vendors, it's a problem.)
>
> -- Tor
>
> On Jul 23, 7:06 pm, CKoerner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I didn't care for the way ROR was treated (except for Tor's who's
> > actually worked with Ruby and worked with Rails). Hearing dispariging
> > dismissals of ActiveRecord by Dick who I believe has practically nil
> > experience with it ... seriously. ROR had alot of Hype but it proved
> > it was up to it and to laugh and ask "Who uses ROR anymore?" just
> > makes you sound like an idiot.
>
> > Anytime you guys throw out Python its treated respectfully, and Ruby
> > is treated like a 'Red' headed step child. Whats the deal with the
> > bias?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to