Jess Holle wrote: > Fabrizio Giudici wrote: >> Frankly, I don't see we have enough information for commenting. >> First, I don't trust rumors; second, what's in a name (apart >> nostalgic stuff, of course)? Third, you're assuming that OpenWorld >> will stay as is and it's not necessarily true. I presume whatever the >> conference will be named, it won't be just like the past year (well, >> current year) OpenWorld. Also, there's probably no meaning for a >> corporate such as Oracle to keep two distinct conference. > True enough. Though I understand OpenWorld is huge and subsumes much > of the SF conference area already. Thus I'm not sure how the > Java-related portion of some unified Oracle conference would not get > lost in the non-Java Oracle stuff. If Java-focused attendees have to > wade through a lot of non-Java stuff that they're uninterested in, the > attendance will suffer. > Agreed, of course. But Oracle just needs to properly define tracks. BTW, at this point the way Oracle organizes next conference will be a good indicator of their attitude towards the community.
-- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog [email protected] - mobile: +39 348.150.6941 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
