Should I just say Apple is purely after a monopoly i.e. the cash, unlike Joe's stated reasons ? Does that make it clearer
On May 3, 5:06 pm, Kerry Sainsbury <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:25 PM, [email protected] < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > To describe Apples doctorine on Flash or Java on their mobile devices > > > as purely due to a want of consistent user experience is just nonsense > > > > The clear reason.... > > > Not convincing! Calling something "nonsense" or "clear" doesn't make > > it so. Try forming a cogent argument next time. > > Well, Liam's next sentence was "You could equally diverge from their > perceived athletics using objective C of any of their mandated > technologies", which sounded reasonable to me -- apart from some issues > with English. > > I believe he meant: > > "You could equally diverge from their perceived aesthetics using Objective C > or any of their mandated technologies". > > Does that make it clearer? > > Why would the UI I create using Objective C be any better than the UI I > would create using any other framework or language, if that framework or > language calls the same UI layer that Objective C does? > > In fact I'm sure that some frameworks could actually enhance the UI that I > would create, because I make AWFUL user interfaces. > > (sorry for jumping in Liam!) > > Cheers > Kerry > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
