Christian,
Glad you like it.

Good point about sales. I am really not worrying too much about that
right now. I just want to make sure that people find it useful.

As for the different take: we are taking a reverse-engineering based
approach as opposed to the more popular design based approaches. Are
there other tools that do reverse-engineering: yes, but they are
typically very limited in their capabilities - so much so that teams
have a hard time using them when they try to follow an agile
development approach. Do you agree?

Vineet


On May 11, 1:29 pm, Christian Edward Gruber
<[email protected]> wrote:
> So - nothing against your offering, which seems pretty nice... but  
> it's not a "different take".  Generating diagrams from code, reverse/
> forward engineering such diagrams, and round-trip stuff has been  
> around since the mid-to-late 90's, and some of it was in decent form  
> at the time, as well.
>
> If you can make it more usable, then kudos... but it's not really  
> innovative in any respect that I saw.  I wouldn't try to sell it that  
> way - a lot of people with experience with those systems are now  
> decision makers and will consider you to not have done your research  
> if you present this sort of thing as new.
>
> Christian.
>
> On May 11, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Vineet wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Wasn't Together Control Center acquired by Borland, and what is not
> > part of their core? I talked to some ex-Borland folk, and my
> > understanding is that what got them popular was this reverse
> > engineering engineering support to something useful that they had
> > added.
>
> > Regardless, here is perhaps the question: What in particular do you
> > like about the video? And, do you use any UML tools? If not, does this
> > meet your needs? What can we do to help you with the tool?
>
> > Thanks!
>
> > Vineet
> > --
> > Founder, Architexa
> > [email protected] :: 617.818.0548
> >www.architexa.com- Know Your Code
>
> > On May 11, 12:34 pm, Robert Casto <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Take a look at Together Control Center. They had the code to UML view
> >> working in both directions. It doesn't have all the nice GUI stuff  
> >> your tool
> >> appears to have, but they did this some time ago and ended up  
> >> selling it and
> >> closing the company because they couldn't compete with Rational.
>
> >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Vineet <[email protected]>  
> >> wrote:
> >>> I have been extremely frustrated with UML tooling in the past, and  
> >>> for
> >>> the last 2+ years have been involved in a project for building
> >>> something very cool. See a video here:
> >>>http://blog.architexa.com/2010/05/different-take-on-uml-a-sneak-preview/
>
> >>> Most UML Tools focus on creating diagrams before coding, but we
> >>> believe in having diagrams made from code. Where other tools require
> >>> months of work to get something useful, we want to get you useful
> >>> results in minutes if not seconds. Some tools require reading lots  
> >>> of
> >>> documentation to use, but we have wanted a tool that you can get  
> >>> up to
> >>> speed in 5 minutes.
>
> >>> What do you think of it? As we are rolling this out, I would really
> >>> like to hear your thoughts on what we should focus on to help you  
> >>> with
> >>> your work.
>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Vineet
>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> >>> Groups
> >>> "The Java Posse" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<javaposse
> >>> %2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> >>> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> > Groups "The Java Posse" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected]
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
> > .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to