Presumably this means they have also agreed on OSGi? On Oct 11, 2010 6:57 PM, "Fabrizio Giudici" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/10 00:42 , Andrew wrote: > > I think what I found most interesting is the suggestion that ... I'm neither optimistic or pessimistic. This move is making clear Oracle's strategy, that there must be only a single open implementation of Java, and it's OpenJDK. Thus the reluctant Google must be forced by law to move Android under the OpenJDK umbrella. My full thought at the moment is on my blog (sorry for the plug, it's just to avoid duplications: http://weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici/archive/2010/10/11/oracles-strategy-now-clear). I'd stress the last quotation, from the Eclipse Foundation praising the move. -- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere... [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" gro... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
