On Oct 11, 11:57 pm, Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm neither optimistic or pessimistic. This move is making clear > Oracle's strategy, that there must be only a single open implementation > of Java, and it's OpenJDK.
Isn't a "single open implementation" a contradiction in terms? Doesn't making software open, by definition, give out permission to duplicate and develop? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
