On 10/12/10 09:14 , Vince O'Sullivan wrote:
On Oct 11, 11:57 pm, Fabrizio Giudici<[email protected]>
wrote:
I'm neither optimistic or pessimistic. This move is making clear
Oracle's strategy, that there must be only a single open implementation
of Java, and it's OpenJDK.
Isn't a "single open implementation" a contradiction in terms?
Doesn't making software open, by definition, give out permission to
duplicate and develop?
You can duplicate it from the OpenJDK. I didn't see any argument that
proved that we have been deprived of that liberty. Still, the point is
that there's a single "way", which is the OpenJDK way.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
