2011/3/30 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]>: > My point was to show that you are completely wrong when you claim: > "Groovy was the first of the non-Java JVM languages, so it has a head-start > some degree of commercial support (not least, via Spring), so it's > unsurprising that it currently has higher adoption." > Scala came out before Groovy. Way before. Therefore, according to you, Scala > should have a much higher adoption than Groovy.
Uh, a very quick wikipedia/google search will show that the number you cite for groovy is horribly misleading. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
