On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Josh Berry <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2011/3/30 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]>: > > My point was to show that you are completely wrong when you claim: > > "Groovy was the first of the non-Java JVM languages, so it has a > head-start > > some degree of commercial support (not least, via Spring), so it's > > unsurprising that it currently has higher adoption." > > Scala came out before Groovy. Way before. Therefore, according to > you, Scala > > should have a much higher adoption than Groovy. > > Uh, a very quick wikipedia/google search will show that the number you > cite for groovy is horribly misleading. > Which number, "Groovy 1.0 was released on January 2, 2007."? -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
