On 05/10/2011 02:05 PM, Kirk wrote:
In other discussions I got the idea that Oracle is used to finding homes for
FOSS things in foundations. Apache is clearly out and Jenkins is a project, not
a foundation. That pretty much leaves the EF.. and the EF is structured in a
way that Oracle understands so if it makes sense or not for Hudson to be
there.. another question.. it's a place that Oracle knows how to deal with and
they like that. Easy, nothing to learn, no risk which means no one gets fired..
very safe!!!
Agreed. BTW, the process of moving Hudson to EF is probably not
painless. If I'm not wrong, among EE requirements are that there must be
no dependencies on GPL (and possibly LGPL too?). The latest time I
looked at Hudson sources I think I spotted a number of (L)GPL used
libraries that I suppose should be now replaced...
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
