On 11 May 2011, at 11:27, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > On 05/10/2011 02:05 PM, Kirk wrote: >> >> In other discussions I got the idea that Oracle is used to finding homes for >> FOSS things in foundations. Apache is clearly out and Jenkins is a project, >> not a foundation. That pretty much leaves the EF.. and the EF is structured >> in a way that Oracle understands so if it makes sense or not for Hudson to >> be there.. another question.. it's a place that Oracle knows how to deal >> with and they like that. Easy, nothing to learn, no risk which means no one >> gets fired.. very safe!!! > Agreed. BTW, the process of moving Hudson to EF is probably not painless. If > I'm not wrong, among EE requirements are that there must be no dependencies > on GPL (and possibly LGPL too?). The latest time I looked at Hudson sources I > think I spotted a number of (L)GPL used libraries that I suppose should be > now replaced...
FYI, the exact list is mentioned and discussed in this hudson-dev thread: http://java.net/projects/hudson/lists/dev/archive/2011-05/message/49 > -- > Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager > Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." > java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people > [email protected] > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
