On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Jan Goyvaerts <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Because this proves - again - how deeply shallow and mercantile Java's >> new owner is. > > > Aren't you overreacting a bit? They missed a deadline, that's it. It's > disappointing, but come on... > I should have been more explicit - my remark was not targeted to Jigsaw specifically. I'm sure the Jigsaw people do what they can with what they get. And if I need modules, well, OSGi is a proven and well documented technology immediately available. I meant the attitude. If it doesn't serve any short-term business purpose, they just delay it. And not meant to be any rude, but it's not "just" missing a deadline in this case, or is it ? We're talking re-re-delayed years. When was Jigsaw release announced for the first time ? The very same slides were shown three Devoxx'es in a row. :-p > > -- > Cédric > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
