Right, we can publish all of the build documentation. --jason
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, David Jencks wrote: > I agree. Having them posted might encourage people to make them more > accurate and comprehensive. > > The xdoclet-generated todo list would be good also. This is now generated > by the all build. > > Along with the javadocs I'd like to suggest we work a little more on the > jmx-api docs I started on that basically provide a user manual for mbeans > from xdoclet markup in the source. > > The info provided is basically the same you get on jmx-console with an > xmbean (currently XidFactory and TransactionManagerService), but I think > it's good to have it as static html also. > > I sort of enabled this everywhere by including the targets in > documentation.ent, however due to parsing problems with xdoclet on excaped > unicode characters it is currently disabled everywhere. I hope to have a > solution soon. > > So, this isn't so much a build system request as a suggestion that we add > additional documentation to all our mbeans (and convert them all to > xmbeans). xdocletgui makes this pretty simple, it shows you what tags are > available and lets you add them and fill in the values. > > david jencks > > > On 2002.09.20 11:59:09 -0400 Dain Sundstrom wrote: > > I think it would be cool (which means it is not a formal request) to be > > able to have some tasks that can build the javadocs and push them to our > > webserver (of course you would have to authenticate by hand). It would > > be nice if this were simple, so we can have (trusted) others post > > results to our site. > > > > Actually, it would be better to have the automatic build scripts that > > Chris runs to be integrated into the build system with server push. > > What I mean is every night we pull down the new code, build, run the > > tests, generate the java docs, and post the source, binary (if built), > > the test results, and the java docs to the JBoss website. This would > > be similar to the Jakarta nightly builds. > > > > No matter what we do I think we should have the JBoss javadocs posted on > > our site or available for download. Maybe it is already there and I > > can't find it. > > > > What do you think? > > > > -dain > > > > Jason Dillon wrote: > > > Can I get anyone who knows anything about Ant based build systems > > > (extensions, helpers, whatever) to send me some feedback on both > > > positive and negative experiences they have had. > > > > > > It is becoming very apparent that we need to overhaul the build system > > > to meet the current and future needs. > > > > > > I would appreciate any input you have. > > > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
