--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Our need for caching is very different from what the > other two, so I don't think that it can be done in > parallel as it requires some very > things in the implementation. I'm still not > convinced that we don't > need a completely different cache from what the rest > of the server will > use.
I have discussed the requirements for the cache from the CMP's perspective (PersistenceManager) with Jeremy twice (and we'll meet this Monday again). I think we came up with a workable solution, the first cache iteration was unusable (hashmap based). The new tree-structured cache should suit your requirements much better. For stuff like "delete all order items form customer with id=34425", we need some custom functionality, agreed. But I think I have a solution for this, and Jeremy and I will discuss it Monday. Other than that, I *hope* that the current API more or less satisfies your requirements. > I think this is a third system that will be very > different from the other two. Maybe, but I do hope the cache can be used by both. > I am concerned that > if we try to support all of these > different requirements we will end up difficult to > use and maintain code, but you are a coding Jedi. > Anyway, my point is I don't think > they can be done in parallel. Why not ? If the cache satisfies both requirements I don't see why we could not proceed in parallel. Bela __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
