A nice production Jetspeed site is http://www.zurban.com/ (online Paris city entertainment guide, there's also a paper edition a la TimeOut).
Haresh Gujarathi wrote: > Hi Todd, > > Its a assuring sign that people like you are devoted to the open source > momentum. > > But I will say u are not getting my point. > > This discussion is not to criticize the Jetspeed development. But is to find > out if > a. the Jetspeed can really be used in the production environment > b. it has sufficient basic features to be spent time and effort by companies > like mine to deploy business sites for clients. > > Look we do not have time and resources to do experiment ourselves and later > figure out that the product is too immature. > That is why I sent out the mail to ask people if they have deployed some > sensible sites on net. > > I do not understand what portal you are running... When I checked back your > another posting, > I suppose you must be referring to http://portal.wisernet.com and > http://portal.wiserlabz.com > I do not see why these sites are great; I just do not see any content. I do > not see any channels into it. They are totally useless as example to assure > community that there are some meaningful sites using Jetspeed. > > Except for http://qld.ieaust.org.au/jetspeed I have not seen any meaningful > deployment of jetspeed. > That is why I have doubts about its readiness for the business "as of > today". I am sure it will be ready tomorrow. > > I hope my reading to be wrong. Because if Jetspeed can be meaningfully used > today, I would like to use it for my clients web sites. So please correct me > if anybody things that way. > > regards, > > Haresh > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: todd tredeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:55 AM > To: Jetspeed Users List > Subject: [opinion] Re: Jetspeed for professional sites; Is it ready > > > I guess you guys miss the point... I think discussion is great, as long > as the purpose if for moving the product forward, adding needed input... > There is lots of great software out there. There are lots of great > programmers from many countries with different perspectives. > > 1. You can suggest what you need (and can't write) > 2. You can suggest / show what other people are doing and have done. > 3. You can contribute, to improve the product, make suggestions, etc. > > Jetspeed, is in reality truly what is great about the #1 Web Server in > the business, the combined minds of thousands (sometimes just dozens or > fewer) very hard working dedicated people. Open Source Software works... > > Sometimes our thoughts are poor, disorganized (mine are) but here is > what I see (as a non programmer) that I MUST have for a 100% go... Keep > in mind, Jetspeed is a great idea, and it is a "work in progress", not a > debate.. > > I would like to see the following aspects addressed in Jetspeed, and am > willing to spend the time with willing programmers to get there.. are you? > > Configuration Routine (usually you have to write this last) as the > program changes to much and > too fast... along these lines I have great ideas.. > > Adding Content "portlets" at will...including; > date content starts > date content stops > content creation (There are a number of nice xml publishing > packages out there, either write one or make a jetspeed modified version > of one) End Users can't do it. > > Calander, ya that would be cool, but.... how about somethiing really > cool, voting, yes, but again, I would like to take it a few steps > further.. who is up to the challenge? > > To demonstrate my committment to this project I run 2 portals 24 x > 7, and work very hard to promote "good" software of all types. > > Lets have fun > > todd > waiting to work with programmers > > Frans Thamura wrote: > > >>No, i think i will use jetspeed in seriously, but, sad man, all the source >>is not documented well, and a lot of big question and little bit crowded.. >> >>There is a software eBdesk.com create by someone in my country, it is >>popular enough.. here...but they approach for corporate portal.. >> >>my solution is for executive information system.. >> >>sorry, i will prepare to put my sample work in the net, but still get a lot >>of BIG QUESTION... >> >>so, if you want to try implement Jetspeed, prepare for the hurt oke.. >> >>Frans >> >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Haresh Gujarathi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:31 PM >>Subject: RE: Jetspeed for professional sites; Is it ready? >> >> >> >>>Hi Frans, >>> >>>1. Can I see on net some of your sites using jetspeed? >>>2. Now that you are aware of the issues in implementing a portal for >>>companies, have you found any other alternative? >>>(cheaper preferrably) ? >>> >>>-- haresh >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Frans Thamura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:44 PM >>>To: Jetspeed Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Re: Jetspeed for professional sites; Is it ready? >>> >>> >>>Hi haresh, >>> >>> >>>>1. How is Jetspeed for deploying a serious business site (if not mission >>>>critical one ?) >>>> >>>> >>>I think for basic personalization is oke, but for multi tab or folder, i >>>think you will got the difficulty, esp for desigining the complex >>>portlet/psml >>> >>>i try to implement this in several company, yah we got a performance >>>problem, slow... >>> >>>I create a business intelligence system based on Jetspeed, called cockpit >>>system , it is a balance scorecard system.. >>> >>> >>>>2. Are there any sites built using Jetspeed ? (other than the ones >>>> >>>> >>>specified >>> >>> >>>>on the Jetspeed home page) >>>> >>>> >>>see in the reference of jakarta.apache.org/jetspeed >>> >>> >>>>3. Has anyone implemented >>>> >>>>chat, discussion forums, polls, as portlets? (etc required to build a >>>>portal...) >>>> >>>> >>>I try poll, but forum, get difficulty to implement this.. integration >>> >>> >>single >> >> >>>login problem >>> >>> >>>>4. How to provide roll based access to the sub sections of the Jetspeed >>>>sites? >>>>For example, If I want to assign 4 different administrators to 4 >>>> >>>> >>different >> >> >>>>sections of a community portal (children, young_minds, adults, senior >>>>citizens), so that those 4 people are responsible for managing the >>>> >>>> >>content >> >> >>>>published in the corresponding sections. >>>> >>>>Basically this is a content management system facility... which I think >>>> >>>> >>>can >>> >>> >>>>be an integral part of the Portal system >>>> >>>>Is anybody working on such (Admin) portlet? >>>> >>>> >>>yah you can try it with admin/jetspeed user >>> >>>but, there is a role tag in xreg. if you implement it you will see the >>> >>> >>role >> >> >>>based portlet. >>> >>>i create several roles in my jetspeed environment, this is a business >>>intelligence system, and work well.. even you must find a trick to >>> >>> >>implement >> >> >>>this.. >>> >>> >>>have a nice try.. >>> >>>Frans >>> >>> >>>>regards >>>> >>>>Haresh >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? >>>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> >>> >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: >>> >>> >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >> >>_________________________________________________________ >> >>Do You Yahoo!? >> >>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>For additional commands, e-mail: >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Raphael Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professional Services Manager Vivendi Universal Networks - Paris -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
